NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)5
Since 2006 (last 20 years)13
Source
NASSP Bulletin192
Assessments and Surveys
Flanders System of…2
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 192 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dandalt, Ed; Brutus, Stephane – NASSP Bulletin, 2020
This article uses an analysis of the language used in the Teacher Performance Appraisal Technical Requirements Manual in Ontario to highlight some procedural issues. Arguably, the existence of flaws in the teacher evaluation system is not only limited to evaluation practices but is also embedded in evaluation regulations. Furthermore, the article…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Teacher Evaluation, Language Usage, Guides
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lomascolo, David J.; Angelle, Pamela S. – NASSP Bulletin, 2019
This quantitative study examined perceptions of K-12 public school principals toward the Tennessee teacher tenure law under Senate Bill 1528 and how principals perceived that the law has affected their ability to evaluate and retain effective teachers. The Tennessee Teacher Tenure Principal Perception Survey was adopted and slightly modified from…
Descriptors: Tenure, Public School Teachers, Principals, Administrator Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Derrington, Mary Lynne; Martinez, James Anthony – NASSP Bulletin, 2019
Teacher perceptions after 5 years of implementing evaluation protocols that were initiated under Race to the Top revealed attitudes about the evaluation instrument used and the nature of their relationship with the evaluator. This study surveyed middle and high school teachers in nine Eastern Tennessee school districts. Data indicated unintended…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Evaluation Methods, Tests, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hopkins, Paul – NASSP Bulletin, 2016
The purpose of this study was to determine how K-12 public school teachers perceive the use of student performance data in teacher evaluations. The proprietary, utility, feasibility, and accuracy standards created by the Joint Committee on Standards for Education Evaluation served as a framework for the study. An online survey was deployed to a…
Descriptors: Teacher Attitudes, Faculty Development, Public School Teachers, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xu, Xianxuan; Grant, Leslie W.; Ward, Thomas J. – NASSP Bulletin, 2016
This study examines the validity of a statewide teacher evaluation system in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Three hundred and thirty-eight teachers from 16 at-risk schools located in eight school districts participated in an evaluation system pilot during the 2011-2012 academic year. Teachers received ratings on six teacher effectiveness process…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Validity, State Programs, Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Khachatryan, Edit – NASSP Bulletin, 2015
Teachers crave yet rarely receive qualitative performance feedback. Though student feedback has been studied, we know little about what kinds of feedback are useful to teachers for improving practice. This study begins to address the need in research on the nature of feedback teachers receive from classroom observations as well as on how teachers…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Observation, Teaching Methods, Administrator Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Woodland, Rebecca H.; Mazur, Rebecca – NASSP Bulletin, 2015
Educational evaluation (Ed Eval) and professional learning communities (PLCs) are two of the nation's most predominant approaches to widespread instructional improvement. Yet key attributes of these reform initiatives are too often experienced by teachers as burdensome, or even detrimental, rather than helpful. The authors of this article contend…
Descriptors: Integrated Curriculum, Faculty Development, Communities of Practice, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miller, Patrick C.; Grobe, William J. – NASSP Bulletin, 2013
The Collaborative Project (CP) began as a pilot project in five North Carolina school districts in 2007 featuring a performance incentive initiative for teachers and administrators. The objective of this study was to document principals' perceptions of the performance incentive initiative to determine challenges encountered during implementation.…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Pilot Projects, Principals, Public Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Matula, Joseph J. – NASSP Bulletin, 2011
Over the past 10 years, since No Child Left Behind started pressuring school districts to focus on student test scores, many states have begun to consider student performance when evaluating teachers. This article will provide preventive measures of fairness and substantive due process to avoid potential teacher objections and gain teacher…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Teacher Evaluation, Federal Legislation, Legal Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Owings, William A.; Kaplan, Leslie S.; Khrabrova, Iryna; Chappell, Shanan – NASSP Bulletin, 2015
Prior research on Troops to Teachers (TTT) affirms that TTTs are effective instructors likely to work in high-poverty, high-minority schools, teach high-demand subjects, use research-based instructional and classroom management practices linked with student achievement, and plan to stay in the profession. A nonexperimental, mixed method design…
Descriptors: Teacher Surveys, Administrator Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Scherrer, Jimmy – NASSP Bulletin, 2011
The use of value-added modeling (VAM) in school accountability is expanding. However, trying to decide how to embrace VAM can be rather nettlesome. Some experts claim it is "too unreliable," causes "more harm than good," and has "a big margin for error," while other experts assert VAM is "imperfect, but…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Accountability, Inferences, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Range, Bret G.; Duncan, Heather E.; Scherz, Susan Day; Haines, Courtney A. – NASSP Bulletin, 2012
This study explored Wyoming school leaders' perceptions about the traits of incompetent teachers, strategies used to work with incompetent teachers, and the barriers to their dismissal. Most importantly, this study differentiated how principals and superintendents viewed incompetency issues. Some major findings include school leaders' beliefs that…
Descriptors: Unions, Career Change, Classroom Techniques, Teacher Competencies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blome, Arvin C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Describes the Student Teacher Appraisal Report (STAR) Guide developed as part of Phase II of a pilot research project in Colorado. Includes a copy of the STAR evaluation form. (MD)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Student Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Attinello, Jacqueline R.; Lare, Douglas; Waters, Faith – NASSP Bulletin, 2006
The demands placed on principals in the era of No Child Left Behind are rapidly increasing. In light of these challenges, balancing diverse roles and additional responsibilities can be arduous for even the finest school leaders. The use of portfolio-based teacher appraisals has emerged as an intriguing option to make the time required for teacher…
Descriptors: Professional Development, Principals, Administrator Responsibility, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Newman, Samuel W. – NASSP Bulletin, 1971
Descriptors: Public School Teachers, Teacher Evaluation, Teacher Role
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13