NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dyer, Henry S. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Reviews 12 studies to determine whether coaching improves student performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). While results are mixed, evidence suggests that coaching does not appreciably improve students' verbal or math scores. Factors such as test reliability and weighting SAT scores with high school records should be considered. Includes…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Scores, Secondary Education, Standardized Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Prediger, Dale J.; Ferguson, Richard L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Career guidance testing should clarify options for career exploration, claim the authors. They suggest three criteria for tests used in career counseling, note recent applications of the criteria in commercially available tests, and advocate use of the "Counselor's Guide to Vocational Guidance Instruments" by guidance personnel seeking suitable…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Career Counseling, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hogan, Canary C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1995
The more students know about themselves and the world of work, the more likely they are to make satisfying decisions about their future. Middle-level school counselors can offer students a variety of career awareness experiences via interest inventories and aptitude tests, career cluster exploration, computer-assisted guidance, field trips,…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Career Awareness, Intermediate Grades, Learning Activities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rudman, Herbert C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Teachers concerned about excessive testing may be depriving themselves of useful information provided by standardized achievement tests and their own exams. Teachers tend to separate testing from teaching. This article explores the relationship among data collection, curriculum planning, and instruction and gauges the impacts of mandated…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, Data Collection, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Popham, W. James – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Tests producing results that are used to make important decisions about students, schools, and curricula should not be developed locally by teachers. Although district educators at all levels need to become familiar with measurement nuances, the development of high stakes tests is best left to measurement professionals. Includes four references.…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, High Stakes Tests, Measurement Objectives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marchant, Gregory J.; Paulson, Sharon E. – NASSP Bulletin, 2001
Differences among states' average SAT scores are almost entirely attributable to differences in percentage of test takers, parent education and income of test takers, and the high school rank and GPA of the test takers rather than to the quality of the states' education systems. Recommends changes in interpreting and reporting SAT scores.…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, High Stakes Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McGee, Jerry C.; Rose, Janet S. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Offers strategies for improving student scores on the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Covers three areas: improvement in instructional quality in high schools; analysis and refinement of opportunities for students to demonstrate and practice test-taking skills; and enhancement of understanding and support among parents, community, and staff. (PGD)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, High Schools, School Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Comras, Jay – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
Provides a general description of the aims of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and focuses on the reasons for the recent declines in verbal and math scores. Also notes the best sorts of preparation--both general academic and specific preparation--for achieving high SAT scores. (JW)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, College Entrance Examinations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ornstein, Allan C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1993
Examines the differences between norm-referenced tests (standardized assessments of intelligence, aptitude, achievement, and personality) and criterion-referenced tests. Until school districts improve their potential to develop meaningful criterion-referenced tests, norm-referenced tests will be the major yardstick for measuring student…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Aptitude Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education