NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)5
Since 2006 (last 20 years)13
Source
NASSP Bulletin192
Assessments and Surveys
Flanders System of…2
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 91 to 105 of 192 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hansen, J. Merrell – NASSP Bulletin, 1978
Teacher evaluation should be implemented as a meaningful way to continue improvement of instructional practice. Evaluation criteria must be carefully defined and measured to eliminate ambiguity. (Author)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barone, Frank J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Outlines a merit pay incentive plan that will improve teacher quality and performance. Includes a sample merit evaluation form. (MD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Merit Pay, Professional Development, Recognition (Achievement)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sullivan, Richard L.; Wircenski, Jerry L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
As instructional leader, the principal sets the tone for quality classroom instruction. Through designing effective observation instruments, conducting planning conferences, recording objective classroom observations, and providing constructive feedback, the principal can ensure that this goal is met. Includes one reference. (MLH)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, Conferences, Elementary Secondary Education, Feedback
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Remley, Theodore P., Jr.; MacReynolds, Virginia B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
Due process hearings should not threaten principals who have performed their teacher evaluation duties well and can demonstrate (1) the persistent nature of the teacher's difficulties; (2) repeated warnings; (3) frequent assistance; (4) adequate time and opportunity to improve; (5) close supervision; and (6) the teacher's involvement in a normal…
Descriptors: Due Process, Elementary Secondary Education, Legal Problems, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Andrews, Hans A.; Knight, John H. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
The recent national report on the quality of education in the United States has noted the need for effective methods of evaluating teaching performance. These evaluations are best done by administrators. The pros and cons of various approaches to evaluation are discussed. Includes five references. (Author/MD)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, Educational Administration, Educational Improvement, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stiggins, Richard J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
In comparing the effectiveness of accountability and growth-oriented systems of teacher evaluation, growth-oriented systems, which facilitate the flow of performance information back to the teacher, are more likely to have a positive effect on teaching quality. (3 references) (CJH)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Teacher Administrator Relationship, Teacher Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fredrich, G. H. – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
Presents a proposal for effective teacher supervision and evaluation that puts the responsibility for supervision on someone close to the teachers, while the responsibility for evaluation remains the principal's. Includes diagrams outlining supervision and evaluation procedures. (MD)
Descriptors: Competence, Department Heads, Elementary Secondary Education, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Embretson, Gary; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
An effective teacher evaluation program geared toward instructional improvement is described. It includes frequent interaction between administrators and teachers and is participatory, diagnostic, and cooperative. (MD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Instructional Improvement, Teacher Administrator Relationship, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beck, John J.; Seifert, Edward H. – NASSP Bulletin, 1983
The proposed Instructional Technologist Model is based on a closed loop feedback system allowing for continuous monitoring of teachers by expert instructional technologists. Principals are thereby released for instructional evaluation and general educational management. (MJL)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Educational Technology, Elementary Secondary Education, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leese, Joseph – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
Traces the history of teacher assessment and of research on classroom interactions. Lists key elements in an assessment program. Discusses the need for trained assessors, teacher cooperation, and reevaluation. (WD)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mahon, J. P. – NASSP Bulletin, 1979
Giving reasons for terminating employees can enhance the credibility of administrators among teachers and the public. The legal and policy review presented here can help administrators with the task of formally evaluating teachers. (Author/LD)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Civil Liberties, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Manatt, Richard P.; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Presents a 30 item teacher evaluation instrument along with a discussion of its application. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Instructional Improvement, Measurement Instruments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carlson, Robert; Mable, Ted – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Evaluation, if not carefully planned and implemented, can do more harm than good. Describes a successful system used to monitor one recent educational innovation. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gainey, Donald D. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
To implement an effective evaluation and instructional supervision program, principals should hold high expectations for teachers, establish mutually agreed-upon performance criteria, improve teacher-administrator relations, conduct unbiased observation conferences, and establish a nonthreatening coaching atmosphere that encourages…
Descriptors: Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education, Professional Development, Teacher Administrator Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pope, Carol A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
Principals may wonder how to evaluate teachers using student-centered, indirect teaching strategies with an assessment instrument geared to reward a more teacher-centered approach. This article offers some suggestions concerning the instructional cycle, classroom observation techniques, postobservation conferences, and the formal writeup. (MLH)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, Educational Environment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13