NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)5
Since 2006 (last 20 years)13
Source
NASSP Bulletin192
Assessments and Surveys
Flanders System of…2
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 31 to 45 of 192 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Howard, Alvin W. – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
With tongue in cheek, the author applauds the accountability advocates for their efforts. His real message comes through loud and clear. (Editor)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, Curriculum Development, Educational Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nickerson, Neal C., Jr. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
Surveys three studies on the use and value of teacher aids and cites the need for more evaluation and research in this area. (GB)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Paraprofessional School Personnel, Teacher Aides, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Popham, W. James – NASSP Bulletin, 1971
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Educational Objectives, Instructional Improvement, Measurement Objectives
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Petrie, Thomas A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Examines nine generalizations about teaching and teacher evaluation and determines that all are incomplete and therefore misleading. Concludes that teacher evaluation can be acceptable to and helpful to teachers if handled correctly. Particularly stresses treating teachers as professionals. (PGD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Teacher Administrator Relationship, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Drake, Jackson M. – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
Contends that the typical substitute teacher program retains antiquated stop-gap measures of little value to a school. Offers suggestions for recruitment tactics, inservice training, and evaluation. (Author/WD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Inservice Education, Recruitment, Substitute Teachers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herman, Jerry J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
Staff evaluation is a high-interest area for all members of the school community. Since there is no definitive research that lights the way to a "perfect" evaluation system, the development of a plan falls upon the local school administrator's shoulders. Guidelines and a checklist may provide some assistance in this endeavor. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Evaluation Criteria, Program Proposals, School Districts
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Spivey, James R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
This evaluation model is an attempt to provide a workable formula for a typical school setting. The key ingredient is a climate of professionalism and mutual trust. (Editor/RK)
Descriptors: Accountability, Educational Objectives, Models, Teacher Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sheerin, James – NASSP Bulletin, 1991
Confronted by lack of congruence among supervisors' identification of teachers' needs, teachers' identification of their own needs, and in-service training, East Brunswick (New Jersey) High School developed a comprehensive staff development program based on videotaped lessons provided by teachers and reformulated teaching behavior descriptions…
Descriptors: High Schools, Program Implementation, Staff Development, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bushman, John H. – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
Principals, this author says, must allow teachers to appraise themselves. Introducing teachers to observation systems and inviting them to participate will give them the impetus to improve their teaching through increased self-knowledge. (Editor)
Descriptors: Charts, Instructional Improvement, Observation, Questionnaires
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Suprina, Richard N. – NASSP Bulletin, 1978
Presents guidelines for teacher observation and evaluation. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Administrator Responsibility, Principals, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Freiberg, H. Jerome – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Outlines a teacher evaluation system that includes the use of the Low Inference Self-Assessment Measure (LISAM). Outlines the use of the elements on the LISAM instrument presented in figures 1 and 2. This evaluation procedure includes the use of audio and visual recordings of the teacher in the classroom. Includes references. (MD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Teacher Administrator Relationship, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vornberg, James A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
Describes the Evaluating Your Faculty Evaluation instrument, a device to help principals clarify their role in the teacher evaluation process and to identify areas needing improvement. To improve instructional leadership skills, principals should involve faculty in criteria development, attend seminars, and constantly examine their own personal…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Instructional Leadership, Management Development, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herrmann, Beth Ann – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Teacher evaluation models focusing exclusively on the quantitative recording and coding of observable behaviors may not assist teachers in improving the quality of their instruction. Teacher evaluation should place more emphasis on qualitative dimensions of what teachers say during instruction. Includes four references. (Author/MD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Models, Qualitative Research, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Powell, Neal J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
Offers a supervision plan designed to help identify teaching deficiencies, assist in planning and managing improvement, and create situations promoting dialogue beween principals and teachers. The plan involves yearly goal setting, pre- and postobservation conferences, and an informal observation process. (MLH)
Descriptors: Observation, Principals, Secondary Education, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hansen, J. Merrell – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
Outlines a career ladder program developed in the Provo (Utah) School District to identify and train teacher leaders. (MD)
Descriptors: Career Development, Career Ladders, Educational Change, Leadership
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13