NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
NASSP Bulletin228
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 166 to 180 of 228 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herman, Jerry J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1990
After principals have involved all stakeholders in developing a school mission and identifying critical success factors, the planning team must analyze strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats within and outside the school; establish strategic goals (outcomes) to support the future vision; and develop objectives and target dates. Includes…
Descriptors: Administrator Effectiveness, Elementary Secondary Education, Goal Orientation, Long Range Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ambrosie, Frank – NASSP Bulletin, 1989
The present confrontational labor/management negotiations model mitigates against the development of a higher form of teacher professionalism. Current union and school management models are highly centralized governance systems. Collaborative planning must be instituted in a collegial manner to be successful. (MLH)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Collegiality, Decentralization, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tewel, Kenneth J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1992
Recounts a fictitious high school's steps to build support for whole school change. To create a framework for change, Farragut High developed a vision statement of organization characteristics and a profile of current school characteristics and assembled people to coordinate the change process. A hands-on leadership role for the principal was…
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Educational Environment, High Schools, Institutional Characteristics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Allen, Lew; Glickman, Carl D. – NASSP Bulletin, 1992
To implement shared governance, 24 Georgia schools joined with the University of Georgia's Program for School Improvement (PSI) to form the League of Professional Schools. This article explains how staff at participating schools overcame the complexities of the new system by communicating openly and breaking issues down into small parts. (MLH)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education, Governance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rowley, Stephen R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1991
Restructuring demands an organizational and cultural break with the past. Because goals are ambiguous and new roles are required, decision makers must relinquish sequential, goal-driven planning for sustained dialogue, inquiry, and risk taking. Principals enhance the process by educating parents and the community and by establishing a…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Elementary Secondary Education, Experiments, Organizational Climate
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Streifer, Philip A. – NASSP Bulletin, 2000
Data-based decision making is a process of inquiry, analysis, and decision making that draws inferences from the interplay of school input/process and output variables. A case study involving a Connecticut district's response to falling SATs illustrates the need for fast, sophisticated information technology systems. (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrator Effectiveness, Data Analysis, Decision Making, Educational Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sebring, Robert H. – NASSP Bulletin, 1978
The redistribution of power brought about by collective bargaining is a major source of conflict between teachers and administrators. This article describes and reviews one school district's workshop conducted to bring these two sides closer together. (Author/DS)
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Conflict Resolution, Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roberds-Baxter, Sharon – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
An essential ingredient of good school administrators is understanding the differences among people. Provides a simplified outline of Carl Jung's typology of personality differences to provide administrators a better understanding of staff behavior. (MD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education, Leadership, Leadership Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brubacher, John W. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
This writer implores the literature dealing with the "in-house" political system that principals participate in. The principal's interactions with colleagues and superiors are all "political," in the sense that he seeks to influence the conditions of his school's environment. (Editor)
Descriptors: Administrator Characteristics, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Role, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ornstein, Allan C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
Because of lack of research and too much political gamesmanship, accountability's great promise may never be realized, say the authors. (Editor)
Descriptors: Accountability, Children, Criterion Referenced Tests, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Surmacz, Ronald B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Lists questions that must be answered when deciding whether to close a school, when planning a closure, and when making sure the closure is successful. (JM)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Check Lists, Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sullivan, John J.; Walker, Joseph J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
A group of 300 graduate students in Georgia, who were also classroom teachers, were surveyed to determine the 10 habits teachers find most annoying in their administrators. The list of habits and suggestions for overcoming them are presented. (Author/WD)
Descriptors: Administrators, Behavior Change, Behavior Problems, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schreck, Robert J.; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1977
The approach to discipline outlined here focuses on the principal, who has the responsibility and the resources to interpret effectively the behavioral differences among individuals. The approach stresses the sensitive, sensible, and effective use of the resources already available to the school. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Communication (Thought Transfer), Decision Making, Discipline
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Johnson, Lewis R. – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
Discusses characteristics of four common administrator evaluation procedures: management by objectives, traditional rating scales, self-evaluation, and administrator outcomes models. Outlines three broad responsibility areas for special-education administrators that warrant evaluation. Introduces a comprehensive, team-based model that begins with…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Maeroff, Gene I. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
Teacher empowerment can be better appreciated if viewed as professionalization, rather than an exercise in worrying about who the boss is. This article discusses three guiding principles toward empowerment (status, knowledge, and access to decision-making), separate needs and vantage points of teachers and administrators, and teacher autonomy.…
Descriptors: Collegiality, Participative Decision Making, Quality of Working Life, Secondary Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16