NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)5
Since 2006 (last 20 years)13
Source
NASSP Bulletin192
Assessments and Surveys
Flanders System of…2
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 151 to 165 of 192 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Peterson, Donovan; Peterson, Kathryn – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
In a research-based approach, the responsibilities involved in teacher evaluation, including unclear and conflicting areas, are reviewed. The author provides a set of six guidelines to consider when developing evaluation systems. (MD)
Descriptors: Due Process, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Peer Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McIntyre, Kenneth E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
While the author supports the concept of merit pay, he points out the problems in applying the system to an educational setting. He advocates developing better ways to measure teacher productivity. (MD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Merit Pay, Peer Evaluation, Salaries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sapone, Carmelo V. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
School board members, superintendents, principals, and teachers in western New York identified both ideal and practical components for their districts' teacher evaluation systems. The strong disagreement of board members with principals concerning these components suggests a need for inservice training of board members and improved communications…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Board Administrator Relationship, Board of Education Role, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Peterson, Jerry D. – NASSP Bulletin, 1982
Lists seven steps for principals to take when terminating teachers: follow good evaluation processes, build a documented case, recommend the termination, notify the teacher, prepare carefully for the hearing, follow guidelines for testifying effectively, and accept the outcome. Expands on evaluation process characteristics, preparing for hearings,…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Administrator Role, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Garawski, Robert A. – NASSP Bulletin, 1980
Describes how a process of collaboration between teachers and administrators is necessary for successful teacher evaluation. Guidelines are presented and then applied to an observation model. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Marks, Merle B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1976
It is now recognized that there are almost as many learning styles as there are learners. Today's teacher is faced with the difficult task of developing a multidimensional system to evaluate his teaching effectiveness. (Editor)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Diagrams, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blake, Jane; And Others – NASSP Bulletin, 1995
Presents a portfolio assessment model that encourages teachers' professional growth while helping them evaluate their subject-matter knowledge; intellectual and problem-solving abilities; pedagogical skills; curriculum knowledge, insight, and skill; knowledge of learners and learning; and attitudes and dispositions. States that when teachers…
Descriptors: Adult Learning, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shreeve, William – NASSP Bulletin, 1993
Survey of 91 Washington school districts found 153 teachers were placed on probation during 1984-87; of these, 40% were first-year teachers, 69% dismissed, retired, or resigned. Evaluated behaviors that proved hardest for teachers to remedy were handling of student discipline, classroom management. Deficiency in one of eight areas could lead to…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Classroom Techniques, Discipline, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, Stephen J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
Proposes guidelines for principals attempting to evaluate teachers' grading policies. Principals should understand teachers' perspectives, ask for copies of their grading policies, be wary of traits (like "effort") not measuring achievement, consider grading information quality, think about homework's role, expect teachers to use numbers and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Responsibility, Evaluation Criteria, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coutts, J. Douglas – NASSP Bulletin, 1999
Administrators' classroom observations should be supplemented by more thorough evaluation techniques. This article describes a simple device for measuring teachers' progress toward completing instructional goals based on electronically submitted lesson plans. Repeated low "turn" rates may signify the need for extra classroom resources or problems…
Descriptors: Computer Managed Instruction, Educational Objectives, Ethics, Instructional Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wallinger, Linda M. – NASSP Bulletin, 2000
Observing administrators should watch and listen to both teachers and students, noting use of the target language by both groups, prevalence of student-centered activities, instructional strategies that encourage language learning and accommodate varied learning styles, well-integrated lesson plans, and presence of a comfortable classroom climate.…
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Check Lists, Classroom Environment, Classroom Observation Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fallon, Berlie J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1979
Principals are not and never have been maximally effective instructional leaders. If any group in education is capable of achieving high quality in educational programs, it is the teachers themselves. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Education, Administrator Responsibility, Instructional Improvement, Leadership Responsibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Huddle, Gene – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
A review of several studies reveals factors affecting the success of teacher evaluations: frequency of observations; teacher involvement in planning and operating the process and coaching peers; definition of expectations; fairness of incentives; and suitable supervisory techniques. Teacher autonomy and the value of evaluations in personnel…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Peer Evaluation, Secondary Education, Teacher Dismissal
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cuccia, Nick J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
The author explains a school-specific lesson observation format that meets the specific needs of teachers and evaluators. The lesson observation components of teacher evaluation become a positive experience for both teachers and evaluators using this system. (MD)
Descriptors: Class Organization, Classroom Techniques, Discipline, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Byrne, Robert – NASSP Bulletin, 1983
Describes current attitudes toward staff development through inservice education, the need to coordinate staff evaluation and inservice programs, and the leadership required of administrators and committees. Particular attention is paid to basing inservice programs on needs expressed by teachers. The program followed in Fort Lee (New Jersey) is…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Advisory Committees, Inservice Teacher Education, Needs Assessment
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13