NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
NASSP Bulletin87
Education Level
Audience
Administrators87
Practitioners86
Policymakers7
Teachers3
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 87 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Talmage, Harriet – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
This article asks and answers the following three questions concerning curriculum evaluation: (1) why evaluate curricula; (2) if curriculum evaluation can be justified, then what are useful curriculum evaluation questions; and (3) given the constraints of time, money, and expertise, how can useful curriculum evaluation be conducted? (DCS)
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hill, John – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
Offers practical suggestions for minimizing 14 problems that frequently occur when curriculum programs are evaluated. Timing evaluations, evaluating appropriate factors, making meaningful comparisons, meeting skepticism, selecting tests, selecting evaluators, assessing evaluation results, and maintaining credibility are among the concerns…
Descriptors: Curriculum Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Redfern, George B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
Although the practice is commonplace, the techniques for evaluating principals and assistant principals vary across the country. Four of the most frequently used evaluation processes and procedures are examined, based on case studies of four school districts in Ohio, North Carolina, Idaho, and Alabama respectively. (Author/TE)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Assistant Principals, Case Studies, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Crawford, Chase W. – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
Criteria for selecting administrative computer hardware are provided. (MCG)
Descriptors: Educational Administration, Equipment Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Microcomputers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heitmann, Helen M. – NASSP Bulletin, 1988
Physical education contributes to the physical, mental, and emotional health of young people. Administrators must recognize these contributions and ensure an effective program by evaluating and retraining teachers to keep abreast of the recent knowledge explosion in physical education. (CJH)
Descriptors: Needs Assessment, Physical Education, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beach, Don M.; Reinhartz, Judy – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
Presents a teacher evaluation model based on the use of an effective teaching criteria list. Includes two schematic figures. (MD)
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Instructional Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Beebe, Robert J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Discusses development of the six components of any sound performance appraisal program: (1) explicit job descriptions, (2) definitions of key areas of responsibility, (3) criteria for performance appraisal, (4) methods for data collection and analysis, (5) written procedures, and (6) legal review of all procedures. (PGD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Personnel Evaluation, Program Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zirkel, Perry A.; Gluckman, Ivan B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
The role of privilege in defamation suits arising from the evaluation of public educators is explored in light of the "Manguso vs. Oceanside Unified School District" court case, in which a teacher brought a libel charge against a superintendent. (DCS)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Board Administrator Relationship, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Friedman, Stephen J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1998
Proposes guidelines for principals attempting to evaluate teachers' grading policies. Principals should understand teachers' perspectives, ask for copies of their grading policies, be wary of traits (like "effort") not measuring achievement, consider grading information quality, think about homework's role, expect teachers to use numbers and…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Responsibility, Evaluation Criteria, Grading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Huddle, Gene – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
A review of several studies reveals factors affecting the success of teacher evaluations: frequency of observations; teacher involvement in planning and operating the process and coaching peers; definition of expectations; fairness of incentives; and suitable supervisory techniques. Teacher autonomy and the value of evaluations in personnel…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Peer Evaluation, Secondary Education, Teacher Dismissal
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Novak, Benjamin J. – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
The evaluative processes used to judge the services of contemporary high schools need the involvement of a broader cross-section of educators and new insights. Scrutiny of the regional associations of the National Study of School Evaluation is also needed. (MD)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Educational Change, Evaluation, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Berman, Martin L.; Baca, Milton L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1984
Outlines the School Climate Audit, a self-assessment system based on 12 factors that have been identified as determinants in successful schools. (MD)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Decision Making, Educational Environment, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lemley, Raymond E. – NASSP Bulletin, 1987
Ten behaviors that can signal that principals are experiencing harmful levels of stress are discussed and possible solutions identified. The behaviors include prioritizing responsibilities inappropriately, responding negatively to work situations, becoming detached, and using time ineffectively. (PGD)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Behavior Patterns, Elementary Secondary Education, Principals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hunkins, Francis P. – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
Curriculum development should be a comprehensive process requiring a broad-based view of the educational system and its place within society, thus necessitating the use of a systematic curriculum development model. Such a model is provided here. Three references are provided. (DCS)
Descriptors: Curriculum Design, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sklare, Gerald; Alsup, Rea – NASSP Bulletin, 1985
A five-rung career ladder designed to allow counselors to assume wider responsibilities and financial rewards is outlined to alleviate the "burnout" counselors experience as a result of their limited opportunities for advancement. (MD)
Descriptors: Career Ladders, Counselors, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6