Descriptor
Discipline Policy | 7 |
Student Rights | 7 |
Higher Education | 5 |
College Students | 3 |
Court Litigation | 3 |
Due Process | 3 |
Student College Relationship | 3 |
Student Personnel Workers | 3 |
Cheating | 2 |
College Environment | 2 |
College Role | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
NASPA Journal | 7 |
Author
Weisinger, Ron | 2 |
Crafts, Rod | 1 |
Gehring, Donald D. | 1 |
Janosik, Steven M. | 1 |
Krislov, Joseph | 1 |
Neiger, Jan A. | 1 |
Olswang, Steven G. | 1 |
Palmer, Carolyn J. | 1 |
Penney, Sophie W. | 1 |
Riehl, Jerry | 1 |
Roberts, O. D. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Information Analyses | 5 |
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
First Amendment | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Krislov, Joseph – NASPA Journal, 1972
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Cheating, College Role, Discipline Policy

Janosik, Steven M.; Riehl, Jerry – NASPA Journal, 2000
Study tests the degree of support for flexible due process in campus disciplinary hearings. Focuses on whether faculty, parent, and student expectations for due process protections vary based on the severity of the potential outcome. Results indicate that respondents expect due process protections to increase as the severity of the potential…
Descriptors: College Environment, Discipline Policy, Due Process, Higher Education

Roberts, O. D.; And Others – NASPA Journal, 1972
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, Civil Rights, College Role, Discipline Policy

Weisinger, Ron; Crafts, Rod – NASPA Journal, 1979
Colleges and universities are not required to allow students the right to counsel in campus discipline hearings. However, since this can be offered as an option to students, it is important that any decision to extend this privilege be thoroughly discussed in terms of its educational ramifications. (Author)
Descriptors: Discipline Policy, Educational Legislation, Educational Policy, Higher Education

Rutherford, Denney G.; Olswang, Steven G. – NASPA Journal, 1981
Clarifies the legal rights of students accused of cheating or plagiarism. Suggests a procedure which addresses those student rights while preserving faculty ability to grade students only on their own work. Discusses due process requirements and issues related to punishment and academic freedom. (RC)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Cheating, Civil Liberties, College Students

Palmer, Carolyn J.; Penney, Sophie W.; Gehring, Donald D.; Neiger, Jan A. – NASPA Journal, 1997
Assesses the use of language prohibiting hate crimes in campus conduct codes and determines whether such language unlawfully regulates speech, or behavior, or both. Examined senior student affairs officers' familiarity with two pertinent court decisions, along with the perceived applicability and use of the decisions in revising conduct codes.…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Environment, College Students, Court Litigation

Weisinger, Ron – NASPA Journal, 1981
Discusses legal precedents on students' rights to counsel in discipline cases. Recommends that student affairs administrators not refrain from making professional judgements in educational contexts. Suggests that a critical review of procedural adjustments can enable institutions to proceed with fair disciplinary processes not defined exclusively…
Descriptors: College Students, Court Litigation, Crime, Discipline Policy