NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Herman, E. Edward; Skinner, Gordon S. – Monthly Labor Review, 1976
In 1974, the University of Cincinnati faculty voted to be represented by the American Association of University Professors in collective bargaining. Faculty attitudes leading to that decision were surveyed and are reported in the excerpt from a paper presented at the annual meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association. (EC)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Faculty Organizations, Salary Wage Differentials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sackley, Arthur – Monthly Labor Review, 1982
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, most wage series rose more slowly in 1981, with much of the slowdown in the fourth quarter; when adjusted for inflation, they showed declines, although the wage-price gap was narrower. (Author/CT)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Economic Factors, Inflation (Economics), Salaries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lacombe, John J., II; Conley, James R. – Monthly Labor Review, 1985
A substantial portion of workers had their wages frozen or reduced; and specified increases were the smallest since the bargaining series began in 1968, reflecting both management's desire to hold down labor costs and workers' concern over job security. Charts and tables illustrating the wage adjustments are included. (Author/CT)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Job Security, Salary Wage Differentials, Unions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lowenstern, Henry – Monthly Labor Review, 1974
The significant historical developments of the cost of living wage adjustments are summarized. Since the concept of cost of living took effect in 1919, developments that are noted are: World War II, the GM contract 1948, the GM Contract 1950, and the impact of the agreements. (DS)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Economics, Labor Economics, Living Standards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morand, Martin J.; McPherson, Donald S. – Monthly Labor Review, 1980
Misleading data reports concerning faculty pay and benefits have resulted from several errors: missing data, misleading data, misinterpreted data, and mistakes in data. Data will be understood only if examined in the context of institutional research, which takes into account the insights of the behavioral sciences. (CT)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Data Analysis, Faculty Organizations