Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Audio Equipment | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Intelligibility | 1 |
| Interpersonal Communication | 1 |
| Mutual Intelligibility | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Modern Language Journal | 2 |
Author
| Kennedy, Sara | 1 |
| Nagle, Charlie L. | 1 |
| O'Brien, Mary Grantham | 1 |
| Saito, Kazuya | 1 |
| Trofimovich, Pavel | 1 |
| Wheeler, Page | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWheeler, Page; Saito, Kazuya – Modern Language Journal, 2022
Although intelligibility is a core concept in second language (L2) speech assessment and teaching research, the vast majority of previous work relies on audio-only stimuli. The current study set out to examine how linguistic and visual information jointly interact to determine the degree of speech intelligibility. Both first language (L1) and L2…
Descriptors: Mutual Intelligibility, Native Language, Second Languages, Phonology
Nagle, Charlie L.; Trofimovich, Pavel; O'Brien, Mary Grantham; Kennedy, Sara – Modern Language Journal, 2022
Comprehensibility has emerged as a useful and intuitive means of globally evaluating second language (L2) speakers in many research and instructional contexts. In most cases, L2 speakers' comprehensibility is assessed by external listeners who do not engage in extensive communication with the speakers, even though the degree to which a speaker is…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Intelligibility, Pronunciation, Task Analysis
