Descriptor
Faculty Evaluation | 15 |
Higher Education | 15 |
College Faculty | 9 |
Accountability | 5 |
Faculty | 3 |
Individual Development | 3 |
Tenure | 3 |
Collective Bargaining | 2 |
Faculty Development | 2 |
Liberal Arts | 2 |
Professional Recognition | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Liberal Education | 15 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Dennis, Lawrence J. – Liberal Education, 1975
An attack on the concept of educational accountability, arguing that teaching is not amenable to cost accounting and that the management concept of accountability, illogically applied to education, which is unproductive in a tangible sense, is a tyrany potentially damanging to society. (JT)
Descriptors: Accountability, Administration, College Faculty, Cost Effectiveness

Kingsley, Marcia S. – Liberal Education, 1976
The variety of institutional policies and personal procedures regarding faculty publishing are discussed and some suggestions are offered for judging the quality of individual publications and restricting the type of work claimed as published. (LBH)
Descriptors: Authors, College Faculty, Evaluation Needs, Faculty Evaluation

Neff, Charles B. – Liberal Education, 1976
A plea is made for a rational and humane effort to reconcile conflicting forces in a genuine movement of faculty development. Faculty members are pulled in two directions: one toward improving performance, and the other toward accountability, retrenchment, or budget cutting. (LBH)
Descriptors: Accountability, Budgeting, College Faculty, Educational Administration

Ashby, Warren – Liberal Education, 1977
The academic profession, whose responsibilities and standards are less clearly defined than those of other learned professions, stands in need of fresh and continuing reflection on its role, suggests the author. (Editor/LBH)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Accountability, College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation

Shark, Alan R. – Liberal Education, 1975
Two concerns about collective bargaining are: (1) the impact of collective bargaining on the college student; and (2) the impact of the college student on collective bargaining. (Author/KE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Contracts, Decision Making, Faculty Evaluation

Martin, Warren Bryan – Liberal Education, 1975
Faculty development programs should help professionals to encourage in students not only a mastery of a body of knowledge but also a familiarity with various modes of knowing. (Author/KE)
Descriptors: Developmental Programs, Educational Objectives, Faculty, Faculty Evaluation

Farmer, Charles H. – Liberal Education, 1976
An effective system of evaluation is advocated as a means to improvement of the teaching/learning process. Colleague evaluation and academic freedom need not be adversaries but may contribute to educational accountability. (LBH)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Educational Improvement, Faculty Evaluation

Noonan, John F. – Liberal Education, 1971
Descriptors: Behavior Change, Change Agents, Course Objectives, Curriculum Development

Reisman, Bernard – Liberal Education, 1986
A survey of selected institutions concerning the use of performance evaluation for tenured and nontenured faculty suggests much confusion and opinion about the issue, but more receptivity than has been presumed, warranting further experimentation. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Job Security

Bensimon, Estela Mara; O'Neil, Harold F., Jr. – Liberal Education, 1998
An ongoing project to measure faculty work at the University of Southern California exemplifies the collaborative approach to producing an assessment instrument that documents both an individual's productivity in research, teaching, and service and determines the worth of his activities in relation to institutional goals. The resulting Faculty…
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Administration, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation

Schall, James V. – Liberal Education, 1975
In response to a critique of teacher performance by student representatives on the faculty council (e.g. that professors were dull and stodgy, even readers of dull notes), the author offers guidelines on how to decide who is a good teacher, how much can be learned froma dull professor, and other basic considerations. (Editor/JT)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education

Bedsole, Dan T.; Reddick, DeWitt C. – Liberal Education, 1978
The Faculty Career Development Program at Austin College is described in detail. Included are the essential elements of a successful program, some specific problems encountered and their solutions, as well as examples of some of Austin's self-improvement projects. (Author/JMD)
Descriptors: Accountability, Career Ladders, College Faculty, College Role

Gerry, Frank C. – Liberal Education, 1978
A discussion of faculty unionization and collective bargaining concerns competing authority structures of administration and faculty, the question as to whether department chairpersons have administrative authority, tenure for deans, the status of part-time faculty, negotiations about faculty promotion and evaluation, seniority, and retrenchment.…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, Department Heads, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Organizations

Nelsen, William C. – Liberal Education, 1979
Faculty development programs are designed to improve faculty performance in all aspects of their professional lives. Six areas of concern are presented: flexibility of approach; individual v corporate activity; new understanding of scholarship; personnel management; understanding student development; and administrative leadership and support. (JMF)
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Faculty, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Development

Poremski, Karen M. – Liberal Education, 1987
Reed College uses a junior qualifying examination, which can take a number of forms, a senior thesis based on the subject chosen for the junior exam, and an oral exam based on the senior thesis to monitor student preparation and measure the strengths and weaknesses of the curriculum and instruction. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Seniors, Curriculum Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education