Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Animals | 2 |
| Conditioning | 2 |
| Association (Psychology) | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| Food | 1 |
| Laboratory Experiments | 1 |
| Learning Processes | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning and Motivation | 2 |
Author
| Gil, Marta | 2 |
| de Brugada, Isabel | 2 |
| Garcia-Burgos, David | 1 |
| Gonzalez, Felisa | 1 |
| Hall, Geoffrey | 1 |
| Symonds, Michelle | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkGil, Marta; Symonds, Michelle; Hall, Geoffrey; de Brugada, Isabel – Learning and Motivation, 2011
In three experiments, rats received exposure to a sucrose solution followed by conditioning with a neutral flavor as the conditioned stimulus (CS) and sucrose as the unconditioned stimulus (US). In Experiments 1 and 2, some rats were given both the preexposure and the conditioning phases in a highly familiar context (the homecage), whereas other…
Descriptors: Cues, Context Effect, Conditioning, Sensory Experience
Gonzalez, Felisa; Garcia-Burgos, David; de Brugada, Isabel; Gil, Marta – Learning and Motivation, 2010
In two experiments, thirsty rats consumed a compound of sucrose and a non-preferred flavor. In Experiment 1, a conditioned preference was observed in the experimental group when animals were tested both thirsty and hungry, but not when they were tested just thirsty. Animals in the control group, which experienced the flavor and the sucrose…
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Animals, Evaluation Methods
