Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Phonemes | 2 |
| Phonology | 2 |
| Child Development | 1 |
| Child Language | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Cues | 1 |
| Finno Ugric Languages | 1 |
| Followup Studies | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Language and Speech | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Finland | 2 |
| Russia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Mean Length of Utterance | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSaaristo-Helin, Katri – Language and Speech, 2009
This study applies the Phonological Mean Length of Utterance measurement (PMLU; Ingram & Ingram, 2001; Ingram, 2002) to the data of five children acquiring Finnish and evaluates their phonological development longitudinally at four different age points: 2;0, 2;6, 3;0, and 3;6. The children's results on PMLU and related measures are discussed…
Descriptors: Phonemes, Phonology, Individual Differences, Followup Studies
Ylinen, Sari; Shestakova, Anna; Alku, Paavo; Huotilainen, Minna – Language and Speech, 2005
Some languages, such as Finnish, use speech-sound duration as the primary cue for a phonological quantity distinction. For second-language (L2) learners, quantity is often difficult to master if speech-sound duration plays a less important role in the phonology of their native language (L1). By comparing the categorization performance of native…
Descriptors: Finno Ugric Languages, Perception, Phonology, Phonemes
