NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mike Sleeman; John Everatt; Alison Arrow; Amanda Denston – Journal of Research in Reading, 2024
Background: This study explored the impact of different cut-off points used to identify children with reading difficulties on the distribution of these children across the three poor reader groups predicted by the simple view of reading (dyslexia, specific comprehension difficulty and mixed difficulty). Additionally, the study investigated whether…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Identification, Predictor Variables, Dyslexia
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Daria Khanolainen; Cara Verwimp; Jurgen Tijms; Asko Tolvanen; Jenni Salminen; Minna Torppa – Journal of Research in Reading, 2024
Background: The adult reading history questionnaire (ARHQ) is frequently used in research on adult dyslexia and family risk for dyslexia. However, this measure is lengthy (23 items), reducing its applicability in studies with extensive assessment batteries. Methods: We identified the best-performing ARHQ items in a sample of 396 Finnish adults…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Grade 1, Parents, Family (Sociological Unit)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Serrano, Francisca; Defior, Sylvia – Journal of Research in Reading, 2012
This paper investigates Spanish dyslexic spelling abilities: specifically, the influence of syllabic linguistic structure (simple vs consonant cluster) on children's spelling performance. Consonant clusters are phonologically complex structures, so it was anticipated that there would be lower spelling performance for these syllabic structures than…
Descriptors: Reading, Age, Spelling, Dyslexia
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Northway, Nadia; Manahilov, Velitchko; Simpson, William – Journal of Research in Reading, 2010
Previous studies of visually symptomatic dyslexics have found that their contrast thresholds for pattern discrimination are the same as non-dyslexics. However, when noise is added to the stimuli, contrast thresholds rise markedly in dyslexics compared with non-dyslexics. This result could be due to impaired noise exclusion in dyslexics. Some…
Descriptors: Reading Rate, Dyslexia, Symptoms (Individual Disorders), Visual Perception
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Snowling, Margaret J.; Duff, Fiona; Petrou, Alex; Schiffeldrin, Josie; Bailey, Alison M. – Journal of Research in Reading, 2011
We report an investigation of the validity of teachers' ratings of children's progress in "phonics" as a screener for dyslexia. Seventy-three 6-year-olds from a whole school population were identified as "at risk" of dyslexia according to teacher judgements of slow progression through phonic phases. Six months later, children's attainments in…
Descriptors: Reading Difficulties, Phonetics, Dyslexia, Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Whitney, Carol; Cornelissen, Piers – Journal of Research in Reading, 2005
This article focuses on applying the SERIOL model of orthographic processing to dyslexia. The model is extended to include a phonological route and reading acquisition. We propose that the temporal alignment of serial orthographic and phonological representations is a key aspect of learning to read, driving the formation of a phonemic encoding.…
Descriptors: Phonemics, Reading Ability, Dyslexia
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hicks, Carolyn; Jackson, Peter – Journal of Research in Reading, 1981
Forty dyslexic children were given a version of the Stroop test which requires subjects to respond to attributes of a set of stimuli while ignoring the conflicting information that derives from another attribute. A negative linear relationship emerged indicating that greater reading proficiency was associated with less interference. (MKM)
Descriptors: Dyslexia, Elementary Education, Perception Tests, Reading Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Singleton, Chris – Journal of Research in Reading, 2005
Thomson was the first of very few researchers to have studied oral reading errors as a means of addressing the question: Are dyslexic readers different to other readers? Using the Neale Analysis of Reading Ability and Goodman's taxonomy of oral reading errors, Thomson concluded that dyslexic readers are different, but he found that they do not…
Descriptors: Reading Ability, Oral Reading, Miscue Analysis, Dyslexia