Descriptor
Court Litigation | 7 |
School Law | 7 |
Search and Seizure | 7 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 6 |
Student Rights | 6 |
Public Schools | 5 |
Federal Courts | 4 |
Due Process | 2 |
Privacy | 2 |
State Courts | 2 |
Administrator Responsibility | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Law and Education | 7 |
Author
Fischer, Thomas C. | 1 |
Lincoln, Eugene A. | 1 |
Phay, Robert E. | 1 |
Rogister, George T., Jr. | 1 |
Rossow, Lawrence F. | 1 |
Sultanik, Jeffrey T. | 1 |
Trosch, Louis A. | 1 |
Zirkel, Perry A. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Opinion Papers | 5 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
New Jersey v TLO | 4 |
Fourth Amendment | 3 |
Tinker v Des Moines… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Phay, Robert E.; Rogister, George T., Jr. – Journal of Law and Education, 1976
Discusses how the constitutional prohibition of unreasonable search and seizure applies to searches of students and their property by school officials, as indicated by recent court decisions. Most of the cases examined were decided by state courts, since federal courts have not generally been involved in this area. (JG)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, School Law

Zirkel, Perry A. – Journal of Law and Education, 1995
Comments on an article in the Summer 1992 issue of this journal (EJ 454 315) in which Professor J. M. Sanchez examined 18 decisions regarding student searches and concluded that the "T.L.O." decision made it possible to practically expunge the Fourth Amendment from American public schools. Introduces article by Lawrence Rossow (EA 530…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Privacy

Rossow, Lawrence F. – Journal of Law and Education, 1995
In contrast with J. M. Sanchez's article in the Summer 1992 issue of this journal, suggests that the "T.L.O." decision marks the full-fledged beginning, not the virtual end, of Fourth Amendment privacy rights of students. (MLF)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Courts, Privacy

Trosch, Louis A.; And Others – Journal of Law and Education, 1982
Argues that school administrators encounter conflicts with the Fourth Amendment when they conduct searches of high school students. Discusses the reluctance of the courts to hold school officials to Fourth Amendment standards; why the Fourth Amendment should apply nonetheless; and an analytical model of how school searches can be accomplished.…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Discipline Policy, Due Process

Lincoln, Eugene A. – Journal of Law and Education, 1989
In 1985 the United States Supreme Court concluded that the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures does apply to public school officials. Offers some hypothetical examples for public school officials to consider regarding mandatory urine testing and the reasonable suspicion standard. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Drug Use

Sultanik, Jeffrey T. – Journal of Law and Education, 1990
In response to an earlier article by Eugene Lincoln, presents two hypothetical cases that respectively deal with the possible effects of drug use on school premises and with a policy governing mandatory urine testing for student athletes. Cites factors that should be incorporated in any mandatory drug testing policy. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Athletics, Court Litigation, Drug Use Testing

Fischer, Thomas C. – Journal of Law and Education, 1993
Traces legal balance in "Tinker" between Constitutional rights of students and caveat that these rights were secure only as exercise did not "interfere" with disciplinary processes of school. Cites changing political landscape; free exercise and establishment of religion; and search and seizure. Concludes that students appear…
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Court Role