NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anderson, Melissa S.; Ronning, Emily A.; De Vries, Raymond; Martinson, Brian C. – Journal of Higher Education, 2010
This analysis, based on focus groups and a national survey, assesses scientists' subscription to the Mertonian norms of science and associated counternorms. It also supports extension of these norms to governance (as opposed to administration), as a norm of decision-making, and quality (as opposed to quantity), as an evaluative norm. (Contains 1…
Descriptors: Scientists, Behavior Standards, Experimenter Characteristics, Research Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kells, H. R. – Journal of Higher Education, 1979
Substantial changes were found to have occurred in the age distribution and evaluation team experience of institutional accreditation team visitors and chairpersons employed between 1970 and 1977. Criticisms such as "clubiness," duplication of effort, and preference for or dominance of certain types of institutions are discussed. (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, Bias, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Troutt, William E. – Journal of Higher Education, 1979
A review of the publications of the six regional accrediting associations is reported and shows that evaluative format varies but that there is a commonly assumed relationship between quality and institutional objectives, educational program, financial resources, faculty, and library/learning center. Assumptions underlying these criteria are…
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Accrediting Agencies, Decision Making, Educational Quality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Neumann, Anna – Journal of Higher Education, 1990
A survey of experienced and new presidents in 32 various colleges revealed that making mistakes is important to learning on the job, including when and how to take action, and when not to. Presidents reported learning about working relationships, contextual differences, the human side of administrative action, and their own limitations.…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Role, College Presidents, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Becker, Samuel L.; And Others – Journal of Higher Education, 1986
Analysis of the functions and responsibilities of faculty-dominated athletic committees indicated six dimensions of influence including: policy, autonomy, hiring, business, academic surveillance, and NCAA power. Seven predictors of degree of faculty control of athletic programs were found. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, College Administration, College Faculty, College Presidents
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chaffee, Ellen Earle – Journal of Higher Education, 1984
The behaviors and subsequent situations of two sets of colleges that experienced severe financial difficulties in the mid-1970s were examined. One set made a dramatic recovery; the other set did not. The more resilient group pursued a combination of adaptive and interpretive strategies. (MLW)
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), College Administration, Decision Making, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smart, John C.; And Others – Journal of Higher Education, 1997
Examined the relationships between institutional culture, decision-making approaches, and organizational effectiveness through a survey of 639 faculty and administrators at 30 public two-year colleges. Colleges with a strong adhocracy culture were able to minimize the impact of difficult enrollment and financial conditions, perhaps by enabling the…
Descriptors: Administrators, College Faculty, Decision Making, Higher Education