NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ682690
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2004-Jun
Pages: 10
Abstractor: Author
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0950-4222
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Immunizing University Research from Patent Infringement: Implications of Madey v Duke University
Guttag, Eric W.
Industry and Higher Education, v18 n3 p157-165 Jun 2004
Prior to Madey v Duke University, universities may have felt that academic research was immunized from patent infringement by the 'experimental use' defence. However, the Madey case has made clear that this defence is 'very narrow' to the extent that universities can no longer safely rely on it. While state universities in the USA can rely on sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment, that still leaves private universities (like Duke) looking for available 'safe harbours' from patent infringement for their research. One of these is offered by the Hatch?Waxman Act if the academic research is for the purpose of securing regulatory approval from the Food and Drug Administration. Another potential 'safe harbour' that was tantalizing raised, but left unresolved, by the Madey case is whether federally sponsored university research is immunized from patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. ?1498(a).
IP Publishing Ltd, Coleridge House, 4-5 Coleridge Gardens, London NW6 3QH, UK. Tel: +44 20 7372 2600; Fax: +44 20 7372 2253.
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A