Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Rote Learning | 3 |
Academic Ability | 2 |
Academically Gifted | 2 |
Cognitive Ability | 2 |
Creativity | 2 |
Reader Response | 2 |
Cognitive Development | 1 |
Creative Activities | 1 |
Creative Development | 1 |
Creative Thinking | 1 |
Criticism | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
High Ability Studies | 3 |
Author
Beghetto, Ronald A. | 1 |
Ericsson, K. Anders | 1 |
Kaufman, James C. | 1 |
Nandagopal, Kiruthiga | 1 |
Roring, Roy W. | 1 |
Shavinina, Larisa V. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Beghetto, Ronald A.; Kaufman, James C. – High Ability Studies, 2007
The authors' recent theoretical work has focused on developing the construct of mini-c creativity and illustrating how all levels of creative performance follow a trajectory that starts with novel and personally meaningful interpretations (mini-c), which can then progress to intrapersonally judged novel and meaningful contributions (little-c) and…
Descriptors: Creative Activities, Creativity, Creative Development, Individual Development
Shavinina, Larisa V. – High Ability Studies, 2007
This paper presented the achievements of the expert performance approach. The 10-year rule of expertise is one of them, a very practical rule. However, the expert performance approach does not answer some important questions directly arising out of its main statements. The cognitive-developmental theory of giftedness can help in this regard…
Descriptors: Gifted, Cognitive Development, Academic Ability, Academically Gifted
Ericsson, K. Anders; Roring, Roy W.; Nandagopal, Kiruthiga – High Ability Studies, 2007
The authors are pleased with commentators' willingness to respond to their target article's challenge to identify observable reproducible phenomena that could be widely accepted as strong scientific evidence for innate talent. In this reply, the authors have organized the ideas in the commentaries into three general categories, namely the…
Descriptors: Interrater Reliability, Reader Response, Rote Learning, Creative Thinking