Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Disabilities | 3 |
Federal Legislation | 3 |
Behavior Problems | 2 |
Court Litigation | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Expulsion | 2 |
Federal Regulation | 2 |
Student Behavior | 2 |
Student Placement | 2 |
Suspension | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Exceptional Children | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Administrators | 3 |
Practitioners | 2 |
Location
New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Common Law | 2 |
Gun Free Schools Act 1994 | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McCarthy, Mary Rose; Soodak, Leslie C. – Exceptional Children, 2007
The present study examined how public school administrators negotiate discipline policies that are intended to protect the common good and the educational rights of students with disabilities. We investigated the political nature of these decisions and the strategies used in reaching them through interviews with administrators in 9 public high…
Descriptors: Discipline, School Safety, Disabilities, Democratic Values

Huefner, Dixie Snow – Exceptional Children, 1991
This article comments on a paper by Mitchell Yell (EC 221 141) which asserts that five common law principles of suspension and expulsion retain their significance after the Supreme Court's decision in Honig v Doe. The article examines factors impacting on placement of students with disabilities, including litigation; federal regulations; and…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education

Yell, Mitchell L. – Exceptional Children, 1991
This paper responds to a commentary (EC 600 331) on a previously published paper (EC 221 141) discussing the Supreme Court's decision in the Honig v Doe case and its impact on suspension and expulsion of students with handicaps and on student placement. The paper responds to arguments presented in the commentary and notes misconceptions about the…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Court Litigation, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education