NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Evaluation Review475
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 76 to 90 of 475 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gardiner, Richard C. – Evaluation Review, 1994
Statistical identification of employees with unusual sick leave patterns can result in false-positive identifications. A computer simulation model was used to evaluate alternate methods of unusual sick leave detection for the New York State Department of Health. Results were used to refine identification parameters and modify supervisory…
Descriptors: Computer Simulation, Employees, Employment Practices, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rossman, Gretchen B.; Wilson, Bruce L. – Evaluation Review, 1985
Three perspectives on combining quantitative and qualitative methods in one evaluation are reviewed: mutually exclusive; separate but equal; and integrated. Ways to corroborate, elaborate, or initiate findings from the other method are illustrated, using a large-scale, three-year evaluation of regional educational service agencies. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Education Service Centers, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Institutional Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lawrence, John E. S. – Evaluation Review, 1989
The relevance of the stakeholder approach to evaluations of development assistance programs is examined. Ways in which the methodology can be useful in fostering interest in evaluation outcomes and in increasing the probability that evaluative recommendations will be implemented are discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Developing Nations, Developmental Programs, Economic Development, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Robert D.; Newman, Dianna L. – Evaluation Review, 1992
A broad set of ethical principles is examined to determine their relevance for evaluation. The five principles of K. S. Kitchener (autonomy, nonmaleficience, beneficence, justice, and fidelity) are relevant to evaluation and are fully represented in the evaluation standards of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greenberg, David; Meyer, Robert; Michalopoulos, Charles; Wiseman, Michael – Evaluation Review, 2003
Used findings from the evaluations of California's Greater Avenues for Independence program and the National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies to illustrate why it is important to question the legitimacy of such syntheses. Results show how tempting generalizations are not justified. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Synthesis, Welfare Recipients
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Birckmayer, Johanna D.; Weiss, Carol Hirschon – Evaluation Review, 2000
Examined six published papers using a theory-based evaluation (TBE) approach. Found that authors of the papers did not always make explicit the relation of their data to the theory of the program. Identified some ways in which TBE contributed to the merit of the evaluation. Outlines lessons for the future of TBE. (SLD)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dehar, Mary-Anne; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1993
Concepts of formative and process evaluation are discussed, and their applications in health promotion and disease prevention are reviewed. Process evaluation fulfills the need for information on program implementation, whereas formative evaluation aims to help develop and improve programs from an early stage. Both evaluations can increase program…
Descriptors: Disease Control, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chelimsky, Eleanor – Evaluation Review, 1987
Some questions about the relationship between program evaluation and forecasting are raised. Contrasting the two fields in terms of mind-set, purpose, problems, advantages, and use shows that although their modes of inquiry are indeed very different in many ways, there is interdependence between the two in several areas. (Author/JAZ)
Descriptors: Evaluation Problems, Models, Policy, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
St. Pierre, Robert G. – Evaluation Review, 1982
This article focuses on the management of federally funded evaluation research by (1) discussing aspects of building an in-house evaluation team; (2) defining possible contractor/client relationships, and (3) considering contractor/practitioner team rapport. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Administration, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Federal Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Oakes, J. Michael – Evaluation Review, 2002
Aims to assist evaluators working with an institutional review board (IRB). Asserts that evaluators must accept the legitimacy of IRB review and learn about requirements and pressures even as they educate the IRB about social science methodology and empirically demonstrable risks. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Social Science Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mohr, Lawrence B. – Evaluation Review, 1999
Opposes the practice of aggregating impacts on outcome dimensions to arrive at one summary assessment of program merit. Suggests that impacts should be kept separate and unweighted, expressed in their own measurement scales. Illustrates this method through an evaluation of the effects of research grants on a university. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grants, Higher Education, Profiles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leviton, Laura C.; Boruch, Robert F. – Evaluation Review, 1983
Federal evaluations in education contributed in numerous and important ways to changes in law, regulation, and management. Information about implementation contributed most often, but information about outcomes, cost, and federal administration also made contributions. These findings differ from previous research that concluded evaluations do not…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Legislation, Educational Policy, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hirst, Eric – Evaluation Review, 1992
The role of evaluation in electric utility demand-side management (DSM) programs is explored, including the importance of evaluation in determining financial incentives that a company will earn for DSM programs. A hypothetical example is presented of the types of problems that might arise when evaluations are subject to litigation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Court Litigation, Electricity, Engineering
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Rebecca A.; Shute, J. C. M. – Evaluation Review, 1991
A naturalistic approach to evaluation is illustrated through the description of the evaluation of a small-scale agricultural project in a village in Mali, West Africa. The evaluation considered program impact as well as the quality of the conclusions drawn using the illuminative model of evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: African Culture, Agriculture, Developing Nations, Developmental Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pinkerton, Steven D.; Benotsch, Eric G.; Mikytuck, John – Evaluation Review, 2007
The "gold standard" for evaluating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention programs is a partner-by-partner sexual behavior assessment that elicits information about each sex partner and the activities engaged in with that partner. When collection of detailed partner-by-partner data is not feasible, aggregate data (e.g., total…
Descriptors: Prevention, Sexuality, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Data Collection
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  32