NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Evaluation Review475
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 136 to 150 of 475 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chelimsky, Eleanor – Evaluation Review, 1985
Four aspects of the relationship between auditing and evaluation in their approaches to program assessment are examined: (1) their different origins; (2) the definitions and purposes of both, and the questions they seek to answer; (3) contrasting viewpoints and emphases of auditors and evaluators; and (4) commonalities of interest and potential…
Descriptors: Accountability, Accounting, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nagel, Stuart S. – Evaluation Review, 1983
New, simple methods for applying benefit-cost analysis in situations where the variables are nonmonetary are discussed. The approach involves handling nonmonetary variables by converting the problems into questions regarding whether a nonmonetary return is worth more or less than a given dollar cost. The article codifies what good decision makers…
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Program Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cook, Thomas J.; Poole, W. Kenneth – Evaluation Review, 1982
The assumption of equal treatment implementation is questioned. Through the reanalysis of data from a nutrition supplementation program evaluation, the power of the analysis of treatment effects is shown to increase when data on the level of treatment implementation is included. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Hypothesis Testing, Power (Statistics), Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
St.Pierre, Robert G. – Evaluation Review, 1980
Factors that influence the sample size necessary for longitudinal evaluations include the nature of the evaluation questions, nature of available comparison groups, consistency of the treatment in different sites, effect size, attrition rate, significance level for statistical tests, and statistical power. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Field Studies, Influences, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stanley, T. D.; Robinson, Ann – Evaluation Review, 1990
One source of bias, regression artifacts, in program evaluations that use regression discontinuity design is identified, and its importance is discussed. A method is suggested for its correction. Although use of this method does not solve the problem of selection bias, it does improve the reliability of nonexperimental methods. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Problems, Mathematical Models, Program Evaluation, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1988
Field experiences with external (qualitative) evaluation audits based on the work of E. G. Guba and Y. S. Lincoln (1981, 1985) are detailed, including evaluation contexts and purposes, procedures, and findings. Such audits represent a viable meta-evaluative tool for assessing the quality of naturalistic evaluation results. (SLD)
Descriptors: Audits (Verification), Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Field Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ward, Victoria M.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1994
An evaluation strategy in which a set of process indicators is applied to programs to reduce maternal mortality in developing countries is presented. The four-stage strategy is illustrated for three interventions: (1) providing safe abortion services; (2) increasing knowledge of obstetric complications; and (3) improving medical care quality. (SLD)
Descriptors: Developing Nations, Evaluation Methods, Intervention, Medical Services
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lutsky, Larry A.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1993
Reliability and accuracy of peer ratings by 32, 28, 33 general surgery residents over 3 years were examined. Peer ratings were found highly reliable, with high level of test-retest reliability replicated across three years. Halo effects appear to pose greatest threat to rater accuracy, though chief residents tended to exhibit less halo effect than…
Descriptors: Graduate Medical Students, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stover, John; Bertrand, Jane T.; Shelton, James D. – Evaluation Review, 2000
Presents conversion factors to be used to translate the quality of the respective contraception methods distributed to a single measure of protection for calculating couple-years of protection in family planning studies. Discusses the implications for the evaluation of family planning programs. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computation, Contraception, Evaluation Methods, Family Planning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mercier, Celine; Piat, Myra; Peladeau, Norman; Dagenais, Christian – Evaluation Review, 2000
Reports on the theory-driven evaluation of a drop-in center for youth that incorporates a literature search, concept mapping with staff, and focus groups with youth. Findings show strong agreement among the three data sources about critical program components. Discusses implications of a theory-driven approach. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Concept Mapping, Evaluation Methods, Focus Groups, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
LaLonde, Robert; Maynard, Rebecca – Evaluation Review, 1987
Two studies used experimental data to evaluate nonexperimental methods of program evaluation for employment and training programs. Results of both studies indicated that the nonexperimental methods might not accurately replicate the experimental estimates. Also, new methods for constructing comparison groups yielded little improvement over…
Descriptors: Adult Education, Employment Programs, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pancer, S. Mark; Westhues, Anne – Evaluation Review, 1989
Evaluation research, if appropriately matched to a human service program's stage of development, can help inform the decision making at each step. The developmental stages of a program, questions to be answered at each stage, and kinds of research activities pertinent to such questions are discussed. (TJH)
Descriptors: Community Programs, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Russon, Craig; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1995
Because of increased aid to developing nations, cross-cultural evaluation has become more common. Whether culture has an influence on evaluation was studied by simulating a study of Mexican and U.S. agricultural administrators. Results demonstrate the effects of cultural differences on evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Administrators, Agricultural Occupations, Cross Cultural Studies, Cultural Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Demers, Andree; Renaud, Lise – Evaluation Review, 1992
Formative evaluation of a community health project providing and promoting low-fat foods in five restaurants in Montreal (Canada) shows that restaurateurs are willing to collaborate in project implementation but not in training waiters and that the project did not cause an increase in market demand for low-fat menu offerings. (SLD)
Descriptors: Community Programs, Dining Facilities, Eating Habits, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hidalgo-Hardeman, Olivia M. – Evaluation Review, 1993
An eclectic approach is presented for the evaluation of services to the homeless. The method combines social network analysis and multiattribute technology to allow for development of a criterion for evaluation of services for a geographic area. Service delivery configuration, evaluation criteria, and a planning and monitoring strategy are…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Geographic Regions
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  ...  |  32