NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Costich, Julia Field – Evaluation Review, 2012
Background and objectives: The evaluation of public health law requires reliable accounts of underlying statutes and regulations. States often enact public health-related statutes with nonuniform provisions, and variation in the structure of state legal codes can foster inaccuracy in evaluating the impact of specific categories of law. The optimal…
Descriptors: Data, Public Health, Legislation, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schochet, Peter Z. – Evaluation Review, 2009
In social policy evaluations, the multiple testing problem occurs due to the many hypothesis tests that are typically conducted across multiple outcomes and subgroups, which can lead to spurious impact findings. This article discusses a framework for addressing this problem that balances Types I and II errors. The framework involves specifying…
Descriptors: Policy, Evaluation, Testing Problems, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Siegel, Karolynn; Tuckel, Peter – Evaluation Review, 1985
Results of evaluation research studies, even those that are meticulously designed and carefully executed, often are not implemented. This article examines some of the critical factors that mediate between the carrying out of evaluation research and the utilization of findings. To illustrate these factors, two case studies are analyzed. (Author/EGS)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation, Evaluation Needs, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heilman, John G. – Evaluation Review, 1983
The article suggests supplementing the social problem study groups and data synthesis approaches to building knowledge with emphasis on synthesizing reviews. Such reviews would strengthen the evaluation profession and promote utilization of the knowledge base generated by evaluators. (DWH)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ross, John A. – Evaluation Review, 1980
An example is provided of an evaluation in which the formulation of explicit decision rules was a central activity. The case for and against the use of decision rules in program evaluation is considered, and the appropriate context identified. Implications for the rights of decision makers are addressed. (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Criteria, Decision Making, Educational Planning, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Locatis, Craig N.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1980
An educational film was shown to graduate students assigned randomly to no review or positive, negative, neutral, or mixed review conditions. Some were given reviews only; others were given reviews prior or subsequent to seeing the film. Information affected ratings; familiarity moderated these affects. Timing alone had no effects. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation, Information Utilization
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Nick L. – Evaluation Review, 1985
Foundation awards for evaluation work granted between 1972 and 1983 are described in terms of size of grants, nature of recipients and supporting foundations, yearly and geographic distribution patterns, and topical areas of primary support. Foundation resource materials are summarized. (Author/DWH)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Financial Support, Grants, Philanthropic Foundations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Braskamp, Larry A.; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1982
A series of studies using simulation for the study of evaluation utilization is reviewed. Communication theory is used as the conceptual framework to interpret the potential influences on utilization. Implications for the practitioners are discussed. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation, Literature Reviews, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dutrenit, Jean-Marc – Evaluation Review, 2005
France is not advanced regarding evaluation in social work, despite a law established in January 2002 making evaluation a legal obligation every 5 years. This article presents a software program to help social services evaluate on both individual and group levels. Automatic dashboard results of the program with special emphasis on the main…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Interpersonal Competence, Social Work, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leon, Federico, R.; Rios, Alex; Zumaran, Adriana – Evaluation Review, 2005
This study investigated the effects of introducing a family planning counseling model at clinics of Peru's Ministry of Health. Providers trained in the model presented greater quality of care and longer counseling sessions than did controls. The main effects, however, were misleading. Nearly all of the quality improvements were contributed by 37%…
Descriptors: Trainees, Family Planning, Counselor Training, Family Counseling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
O'Sullivan, Elizabethann – Evaluation Review, 1985
Decision Support Systems (DSS) are automated information systems designed to aid administrative decision making. A literature review on the design, implementation, and evaluation of DSS, suggests that evaluators act as liasons between designers and managers, identify and collect data for DSS, and evaluate DSS. (Author/EGS)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Decision Making, Decision Support Systems, Evaluation