Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Crime Prevention | 3 |
| Criminals | 3 |
| Behavior Problems | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Drug Addiction | 1 |
| Drug Rehabilitation | 1 |
| Family Violence | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Gender Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation Review | 3 |
Author
| Chen, Shuling | 1 |
| Gerald Gaes | 1 |
| Haas, Marion | 1 |
| Lancsar, Emily | 1 |
| Lind, Bronwyn | 1 |
| Shanahan, Marian | 1 |
| Sorenson, Susan B. | 1 |
| Weatherburn, Don | 1 |
| William Rhodes | 1 |
| William Sabol | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWilliam Rhodes; Gerald Gaes; William Sabol – Evaluation Review, 2025
When individuals are released from prison, they typically enter a period of post confinement community supervision. While under community supervision, their behaviors are subject to special conditions requiring them to report to supervisors and prohibiting certain behaviors such as drug and alcohol use. Many supervisees are returned to prison…
Descriptors: Criminals, Recidivism, Crime Prevention, Supervision
Shanahan, Marian; Lancsar, Emily; Haas, Marion; Lind, Bronwyn; Weatherburn, Don; Chen, Shuling – Evaluation Review, 2004
In New South Wales, Australia, a cost-effectiveness evaluation was conducted of an adult drug court (ADC) program as an alternative to jail for criminal offenders addicted to illicit drugs. This article describes the program, the cost-effectiveness analysis, and the results. The results of this study reveal that, for the 23-month period of the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cost Effectiveness, Substance Abuse, Program Evaluation
Sorenson, Susan B. – Evaluation Review, 2006
Federal law prohibits the purchase or possession of a firearm by persons convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence and those under certain domestic violence restraining orders. The purpose of this investigation is to examine public sentiment about the removal of firearms in the absence of a restraining order or misdemeanor conviction following…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Weapons, Telephone Surveys, Males
