Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Drinking | 2 |
| Research Methodology | 2 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Alcohol Abuse | 1 |
| Campuses | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Continuation Students | 1 |
| Estimation (Mathematics) | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Field Studies | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation Review | 2 |
Author
| Clapp, John D. | 1 |
| Johnson, Mark B. | 1 |
| Lange, James E. | 1 |
| Lauer, Elizabeth | 1 |
| Snowden, Cecelia B. | 1 |
| Stacy, Alan W. | 1 |
| Sussman, Steve | 1 |
| Voas, Robert B. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkJohnson, Mark B.; Lange, James E.; Voas, Robert B.; Clapp, John D.; Lauer, Elizabeth; Snowden, Cecelia B. – Evaluation Review, 2006
Alcohol use is highly prevalent among U.S. college students, and alcohol-related problems are often considered the most serious public health threat on American college campuses. Although empirical examinations of college drinking have relied primarily on self-report measures, several investigators have implemented field studies to obtain…
Descriptors: Field Studies, Campuses, Public Health, Drinking
Peer reviewedSussman, Steve; Stacy, Alan W. – Evaluation Review, 1994
The following methods of estimating school-level experimentation with drugs by adolescents at 20 California continuation high schools are compared: (1) self-reports; (2) prevalence estimates from students; (3) prevalence estimates from school staff; (4) naturalistic observation; and (5) refuse (garbage) analysis. Advantages of refuse analysis are…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Continuation Students, Drinking, Estimation (Mathematics)
