NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 17 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 2014
Fifty years ago, Robert Glaser introduced the concept of criterion-referenced measurement in an article in American Psychologist. Its early proponents predicted that this measurement strategy would revolutionize education. But has it lived up to its promise? W. James Popham explores this question by looking at the history of criterion-referenced…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Program Effectiveness, Misconceptions, Test Interpretation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Popham, W. James; Rankin, Stuart C. – Educational Leadership, 1980
The Detroit (Michigan) High School Proficiency Program emphasizes instruction as well as testing. (Author)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Mathematics, Minimum Competency Testing, Reading
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 1977
Argues that customized criterion-referenced tests produced for use by particular school systems are preferable to "off-the-shelf" criterion-referenced tests or standardized norm-referenced tests, and briefly discusses some of the problems related to developing effective customized criterion-referenced tests. (JG)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dziuban, Charles D.; Vickery, Kenneth V. – Educational Leadership, 1973
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Measurement Techniques, Standardized Tests, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 1988
Criticizes Robert Slavin's "best evidence" rejection of mastery learning research for being potentially biased, highly subjective, and misleading. Apparently, Slavin threw out studies of less than four weeks' duration, discounted certain nonclassroom results achieved by teachers, and rejected studies not using standardized,…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Strategies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Haladyna, Tom – Educational Leadership, 1982
Describes two types of criterion-referenced testing that districts can use to measure achievement outcomes of their instructional programs: a random sampling assessment plan and an item-response theory assessment plan. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Item Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wiggins, Grant – Educational Leadership, 1994
Too many report cards have grades and comments that are encoded and not standard referenced. To ease parents' confusion, reports should clearly distinguish between standard- and norm-referenced achievement, express teachers' judgments about student progress, consider longitudinal standards, identify strengths and weaknesses, distinguish between…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Intellectual Development, Norm Referenced Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
King, Jean A.; Evans, Karen M. – Educational Leadership, 1991
Outcome-based education is rooted in earlier ideas, such as Tyler's objectives, Spady's outcomes, Glaser's criterion-referenced measurement, Bloom's mastery learning, 1970s accountability concerns, and the 1960s competency-based education movement. Minnesota's experience suggests various practical implementation challenges concerned with…
Descriptors: Accountability, Competency Based Education, Criterion Referenced Tests, Curriculum Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Popham, W. James – Educational Leadership, 1978
A well-constructed criterion-referenced test has an unambiguous descriptive scheme, an adequate number of items, a sufficiently limited focus, reliability, validity, and comparative data. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Competency Based Education, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Guskey, Thomas R. – Educational Leadership, 2001
Educators can develop fair and accurate standards-based grading/reporting by switching to criterion-referenced grading practices; using differentiated criteria (denoting product, process, and progress); clarifying the purpose of each reporting tool; and developing a reporting form that identifies standards, facilitates interpretation, and…
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hannon, Joseph P.; Katims, Michael – Educational Leadership, 1979
Briefly describes a comprehensive reading program based on the ideas of mastery learning. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education, Instructional Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Meisels, Samuel J. – Educational Leadership, 1989
School districts are increasingly instituting kindergarten retention policies and establishing readiness and pre-first-grade transition programs. Using readiness tests to classify, promote, and retain children is inappropriate and costly. Various high stakes tests are reviewed and alternative strategies suggested. Includes 18 references. (MLH)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Class Size, Criterion Referenced Tests, Early Childhood Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brandt, Ron – Educational Leadership, 1978
A collage of excerpts about the Florida Minimum Competencies Testing Program. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Accountability, Basic Skills, Competency Based Education, Criterion Referenced Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Evans, David N. – Educational Leadership, 1975
This article first describes the growing trend of using criterion referenced tests, and then explores the need for setting standards for these types of tests. (RC)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cohen, S. Alan; Hyman, Joan S. – Educational Leadership, 1979
The Learning for Mastery approach is clearly more effective than traditional instruction, but individualized programs are better than group-based ones. Students master more objectives with mastery learning because their level of participation is higher. (Author)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Individualized Instruction
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2