Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 12 |
Descriptor
Source
Education Next | 15 |
Author
Peterson, Paul E. | 3 |
Hess, Frederick M. | 2 |
Loveless, Tom | 2 |
Petrilli, Michael J. | 2 |
Ackerman, Matthew | 1 |
Cohen, Michael | 1 |
Finn, Chester E., Jr. | 1 |
Jacob, Brian | 1 |
Kane, Thomas J. | 1 |
Kronholz, June | 1 |
Lefgren, Lars | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 15 |
Opinion Papers | 7 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 7 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
Grade 4 | 4 |
Grade 8 | 4 |
Secondary Education | 4 |
Intermediate Grades | 3 |
Junior High Schools | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
High Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 12 |
Race to the Top | 4 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Every Student Succeeds Act… | 1 |
Goals 2000 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 3 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Loveless, Tom – Education Next, 2020
Education standards do not flop spectacularly. Their failure gives rise to nothing like the black-and-white films of early aeronautical experiments: no missiles exploding on launch pads or planes tumbling from the sky. But 10 years after 46 of the 50 states adopted the Common Core standards, the lack of evidence that they have improved student…
Descriptors: Common Core State Standards, Academic Standards, Failure, Educational Policy
Polikoff, Morgan S.; Petrilli, Michael J.; Loveless, Tom – Education Next, 2020
The Common Core State Standards, released in 2010, were rapidly adopted by more than 40 states. Champions maintained that these rigorous standards would transform American education, but the initiative went on to encounter a bumpy path. A decade on, what are we to make of this ambitious effort? What kind of impact, if any, has it had on the…
Descriptors: Common Core State Standards, National Standards, Elementary Secondary Education, Public Schools
Peterson, Paul E.; Ackerman, Matthew – Education Next, 2015
Since No Child Left Behind (NCLB) was enacted into federal law in 2002, states have been required to test students in grades 3 through 8 and again in high school to assess math and reading achievement. The federal law also asks states to establish the performance level students must reach on the exams in order to be identified as…
Descriptors: State Standards, Reading Achievement, Mathematics Achievement, Language Proficiency
Starr, Joshua P.; Spellings, Margaret – Education Next, 2014
More than 40 states plan to assess student performance with new tests tied to the Common Core State Standards. In summer 2013, results from Common Core-aligned tests in New York showed a steep decline in outcomes. Common Core advocates hailed the scores as an honest accounting of school and student performance, while others worried that they…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, State Standards, Academic Standards, Scores
McShane, Michael Q. – Education Next, 2014
This article presents a debate over the Common Core State Standards Initiative as it has rocketed to the forefront of education policy discussions around the country. The author contends that there is value in having clear cross state standards that will clarify the new online and blended learning that the growing use of technology has provided…
Descriptors: State Standards, Academic Standards, Educational Policy, Electronic Learning
Kronholz, June – Education Next, 2011
Presidents at least as far back as Bill Clinton have made attendance a priority of their school-reform efforts, in part because of the social costs of youngsters not attending. There's a direct line from truancy to juvenile crime, gang membership, and drug use, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. There's an equally direct line from…
Descriptors: School Holding Power, Academic Persistence, Dropout Prevention, Truancy
Finn, Chester E., Jr.; Meier, Deborah – Education Next, 2009
The push for a national curriculum is gaining momentum as reformers press states to acknowledge "world class" benchmarks for student achievement. The topic had been dormant since Clinton-era efforts to promote "voluntary national standards" yielded little more than charges of political correctness. With No Child Left Behind now…
Descriptors: National Curriculum, Benchmarking, Academic Achievement, State Standards
Springer, Matthew G. – Education Next, 2008
Increasingly frequent journalistic accounts report that schools are responding to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) by engaging in what has come to be known as "educational triage." Although these accounts rely almost entirely on anecdotal evidence, the prospect is of real concern. The NCLB accountability system divides schools into those in…
Descriptors: Educational Needs, Equal Education, Minimum Competency Testing, Educational Improvement
Petrilli, Michael J. – Education Next, 2005
The charter school movement turns 14 this year, and its behavior, some might say, is "developmentally appropriate." Unruly and temperamental, impassioned and energetic, growing in fits and starts and fiercely independent, even friends and supporters aren't quite sure what to do with it. And now comes the apex of adolescence: the identity…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Role Models, Public Education, Charter Schools
Peterson, Paul E.; Hess, Frederick M. – Education Next, 2006
While No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires all students to be "proficient" in math and reading by 2014, the precedent-setting 2002 federal law also allows each state to determine its own level of proficiency. It's an odd discordance at best. It has led to the bizarre situation in which some states achieve handsome proficiency results by…
Descriptors: State Standards, State Officials, Federal Legislation, Accountability
Peterson, Paul E.; Hess, Frederick M. – Education Next, 2005
It turns out that in complying with the requirements of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), some states have decided to be a whole lot more generous than others in determining whether students are proficient at math and reading. Because each state selects its own testing system and sets its own passing scores, there is no direct way to compare the…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Grade 8, National Competency Tests, State Standards
Jacob, Brian; Lefgren, Lars – Education Next, 2007
Recent government education policies seem to assume that academic achievement as measured by test scores is the primary objective of public education. A prime example is the federal No Child Left Behind law, which requires schools to bring all of their students to "proficient" levels on math and reading tests by 2014. Many state…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Elementary School Students, Public Education, Academic Achievement

Cohen, Michael – Education Next, 2002
Draws on lessons learned from the Clinton Administration's efforts to implement 1994 federal legislation (Goals 2002 and Elementary and Secondary Education Act reauthorization) to inform state and federal officials' efforts to implement the No Child Left Behind Act. (PKP)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation
Kane, Thomas J.; Rockoff, Jonah E.; Staiger, Douglas O. – Education Next, 2007
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) mandates a "highly qualified" teacher in every classroom. To meet the standard, teachers must have a bachelor's degree, be state-certified, and prove they know the subjects they teach, either by satisfying minimum course-taking requirements or passing a test in the subject they teach. But will compliance…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Teacher Qualifications, Teacher Certification, Public School Teachers
Peyser, James A. – Education Next, 2006
There can be little doubt that there is wide variation in the rigor and quality of state standards and assessments. Moreover, it is clear that the vast majority of states have set their academic achievement bar far lower than federal standards, as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Since No Child Left Behind (NCLB)…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Test Results, State Standards, Grants