Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Charter Schools | 1 |
| Educational Improvement | 1 |
| Federal Legislation | 1 |
| Intervention | 1 |
| School Choice | 1 |
| School Districts | 1 |
| School Restructuring | 1 |
Source
| Education Next | 1 |
Author
| Mead, Sara | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Alabama | 1 |
| California | 1 |
| Colorado | 1 |
| Georgia | 1 |
| Hawaii | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| Michigan | 1 |
| Nebraska | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
| Ohio | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Improving Americas Schools… | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMead, Sara – Education Next, 2007
The passage of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) in 2001 brought new urgency to the task of turning around low-performing schools. While many schools have been identified as needing improvement under NCLB, only a small percentage have failed to make progress for long enough--six years--to be subject to restructuring, the most serious consequence…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, School Districts, Charter Schools
