NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Parr, Morgan N. Di Napoli; O'Neal, Elizabeth E.; Zhou, Shiwen; Williams, Breanna; Butler, Katherine M.; Chen, Andy; Kearney, Joseph K.; Plumert, Jodie M. – Developmental Psychology, 2023
This investigation examined whether the mode of locomotion matters in how 8-, 10-, 12-, and 14-year-old children (N = 91) judge dynamic affordances in a complex perception-action task with significant safety risks. The primarily European American children in the sample came from the area of Iowa City, Iowa and were balanced for gender. The same…
Descriptors: Children, Adolescents, Physical Activities, Affordances
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Derksen, Daniel G.; Giroux, Megan E.; Newman, Eryn J.; Bernstein, Daniel M. – Developmental Psychology, 2022
When semantically-related photos appear with true-or-false trivia claims, people more often rate the claims as true compared to when photos are absent--"truthiness." This occurs even when the photos lack information useful for assessing veracity. We tested whether truthiness changed in magnitude as a function of participants' age in a…
Descriptors: Credibility, Semantics, Evaluative Thinking, Age Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Enright, Robert D.; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1984
Tests the construct of belief-discrepancy reasoning (i.e., judgments people make about others who disagree with them). First, fourth, seventh, and tenth graders were assessed and retested one year later. Longitudinal trends supported a four-stage development toward open-mindedness which was confirmed by another study of fourth and seventh graders…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Children, Cross Cultural Studies, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kitchener, Karen Strohm; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1993
This study tested the predictions of Fischer's skill theory for Kitchener and King's reflective judgment model. A total of 156 14- to 28-year-old students were tested, utilizing the Reflective Judgement Interview (RJI) and Prototypic Reflective Judgement Interview (PRJI). Subjects scored higher on the PRJI than they did on the RJI. There was a…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pasupathi, Monisha; Staudinger, Ursula M.; Baltes, Paul B. – Developmental Psychology, 2001
Compared adolescents' (14 to 20 years) and young adults' (21 to 37 years) wisdom-related knowledge and judgment related to difficult and ill-defined life dilemmas. Rated responses along five wisdom criteria. Found that adolescents performed at lower levels than young adults but also demonstrated substantial age increments in performance.…
Descriptors: Adolescent Development, Adolescents, Age Differences, Cognitive Development