Provides a collection of concrete, practical ideas for influencing local school decisions about art education. Practical suggestions fit into the categories of alliance building, developing consensus, skillfully presenting your case, using numbers, and obtaining publicity. (JDH)

Offers a "marketing strategy" for arts education. Provides statistics from the Americans and the Arts survey, conducted in 1984 by the National Research Center of the Arts, which shows solid public support for the arts both in and out of school. (JDH)

Provides an annotated bibliography for art education. Includes the following areas of interest: educational evaluation, tests and measurements, philosophical and aesthetic issues in art evaluation, and testing and evaluation in the visual arts. (GG)

Discusses the future of art education in relation to changing demographics, technologies, values, and art forms. Reiterates two basic theories of art education: a separate subject with a defined place in the curriculum or a decentralized approach in which teacher involvement in the planning process has priority. (GG)

States that the critical work for art educators will continue to be curriculum development and implementation. Claims that an emergent issue for art education is a community-relevant, developmentally appropriate curriculum. Discusses issues facing curriculum developers and outlines criteria for the art education curriculum. (GG)

Outlines how past art education provided a refuge for students from the rigors of other academic subjects. Observes that in recent years art education has become "discipline based." Argues that art educators need to reaffirm their commitment to a humanistic way of knowing. (KM)

Maintains that art education programs in United States schools are in desperate need of strengthening. Provides practical advice on how to begin this process, including: teacher training, inservice workshops, forming new partnerships between schools and museums, and various forms of advocacy. (JDH)

Claims that art programs have made a less than positive impact upon consumers due to the fragmented nature of the curriculum. Argues that art should have content which can be taught, learned, and evaluated. Sees discipline-based art education as instrumental in placing visual art in a more academic setting. (KO)

Argues that art history should have a more prominent place in primary and secondary education. Suggests promoting art history by (1) ensuring that teachers are knowledgeable in the discipline; (2) studying art history through other disciplines; and (3) exposing students to real artworks, local architecture, and the significance of popular culture.…

Responds to Charles Fowler's article, "Arts Education and the NEA: Does the National Science Foundation Point the Way?" Recommends that the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) work together to promote intellectual values in schooling. Suggests that the NEA follow the NSF in its commitment to…

Responds to Charles Fowler's article, "Arts Education and the NEA: Does the National Science Foundation Point the Way?" Notes differences between art and science, and the educational efforts of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and the National Science Foundation (NSF). Recommends several actions to prove NEA's commitment to…

Responds to Charles Fowler's article, "Arts Education and the NEA: Does the National Science Foundation Point the Way?" Suggests that arts education is in crisis because of lack of audience support. Recommends that the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) emphasize the importance of arts education as a part of basic education. (KM)

Suggests that educational reform efforts, such as the back-to-basics movement, leave art educators wondering whether visual arts instruction will survive the reforms. Argues that the three Rs are insufficient for a balanced education. Asserts that the arts foster both affective and cognitive development. (KM)

Examines what the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) can learn about educational policy from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Lists similarities and differences between the two agencies' commitment and approach to education. Discusses the role of the Department of Education and makes policy recommendations for the NEA. (KM)

Responds to Charles Fowler's article, "Arts Education and the NEA: Does the National Science Foundation Point the Way?" Does not agree that the National Science Foundation's approach to education is a suitable model for arts education. Suggests replacing the National Endowment for the Arts with a Department of Cultural Resources.…