NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tillson, John B. – Democracy & Education, 2017
In response to van Waarden's paper, which denied the possibility of horizontal tolerance between citizens, I argue that tolerance is both possible and often desirable between citizens. I also argue that a more substantive set of constraints are required for justice to be served than mere deference to whatever existing constitutions and laws happen…
Descriptors: Democracy, Social Attitudes, Justice, Politics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thomas-Reid, Matthew – Democracy & Education, 2018
First, I review the context for the need of new deliberative models, specifically agonistic deliberative models, for public discourse and for use in training students for public discourse. I then highlight five specific points that I trouble and enrich, principally through the work of Giroux, Arendt, Biesta, and Duarte. While I agree that there is…
Descriptors: Democracy, Models, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Citizenship Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pechtelidis, Yannis; Kioupkiolis, Alexandros – Democracy & Education, 2020
This paper presents the emergent paradigm of the "commons" as an alternative value and action system in the field of education, and it critically draws out the implications of the commons for refiguring education and its potential contribution to democratic transformation. The paper delves into an independent pedagogical community,…
Descriptors: Democratic Values, Early Childhood Education, Citizenship Education, Interpersonal Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lo, Jane C. – Democracy & Education, 2017
Deliberative models of democratic education encourage the discussion of controversial issues in the classroom (e.g., Hess, 2009); however, they tend to curtail conflicts for the sake of consensus. Agonism, on the other hand, can help support the deliberative model by attending to antagonism in productive ways (Ruitenberg, 2009). In this paper, I…
Descriptors: Democracy, Empowerment, Conflict, Controversial Issues (Course Content)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zembylas, Michalinos – Democracy & Education, 2018
This is a response to Ásgeir Tryggvason's argument that the deliberative critique of the agonistic approach to citizenship education is based on a misreading of the main concepts in agonistic theory--a misreading that has important implications for any attempt to bring closer agonism and deliberation in citizenship education. My aim in this…
Descriptors: Political Attitudes, Debate, Politics, Citizenship Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tryggvason, Ásgeir – Democracy & Education, 2018
Due to the current political challenges facing democratic societies, including an apparent presence of populist rhetoric, the question of how political discussions should take place in democratic education is as urgent as ever. In the last two decades, one of the most prominent approaches to this question has been the use of deliberative theory.…
Descriptors: Democracy, Debate, Politics, Democratic Values
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stoddard, Jeremy – Democracy & Education, 2014
Despite the potential for media and technology to act as a democratizing force and the challenges to democracy posed by partisanship and the explosion of political media spending, media education and the preparation of active citizens in schools is virtually nonexistent. This essay presents the case for revitalizing media education for the age of…
Descriptors: Citizenship Education, Democratic Values, Media Literacy, Educational Needs