Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Cheating | 4 |
Student Attitudes | 3 |
Grades (Scholastic) | 2 |
Academic Failure | 1 |
Adult Students | 1 |
Assignments | 1 |
Caring | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
Continuing Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
College Teaching | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 4 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kiviniemi, Marc T. – College Teaching, 2015
This paper discusses the rationale of implementing an "academic dishonesty equals F policy." The author asserts that faculty must take seriously those things which students are expected to take seriously. Integrity--academic, personal, and professional--is worth taking seriously. He goes on to provide three rationales to justify this…
Descriptors: Cheating, Academic Failure, Grades (Scholastic), Educational Policy
Culver, Tiffany F. – College Teaching, 2014
After receiving notification from administration that faculty could enroll in six semester hours cost-free, Tiffany F. Culver began to consider taking classes. Once she had enrolled in a master's-level counseling course, she soon discovered that she was totally lacking in the student experience as she navigated through frustrating advances in…
Descriptors: Reentry Students, Continuing Education, Student Attitudes, Adult Students
Nath, Leda; Lovaglia, Michael – College Teaching, 2009
Academic dishonesty is unethical. Exam cheating is viewed as more serious than most other forms (Pincus and Schmelkin 2003). The authors review the general cheating problem, introduce a program to conservatively identify likely cheaters on multiple-choice exams, and offer a procedure for handling likely cheaters. Feedback from students who confess…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Cheating, Multiple Choice Tests, Student Attitudes
Edwards, Nelta M. – College Teaching, 2007
This article analyzes a social statistics class that engaged in self-grading. Students liked self-grading because they identified their own mistakes, it reinforced what they learned, and they received immediate feedback. Some students worried that others would cheat, but this assertion was not confirmed in the data and the possibility of cheating…
Descriptors: Statistics, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Self Evaluation (Individuals)