NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
White, James M.; Skaggs, C. Thomas – College Student Journal, 1978
It was concluded that the factor structure of the Student Input for Teaching faculty evaluation instrument was similar in nature to the factor structures of other widely used evaluation instruments and no unique factors were defined. (Author)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Measurement Instruments, Research Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Swanson, Ronald G. – College Student Journal, 1974
This article proposed a teacher evaluation system based upon the assumption that teachers are leaders, and that teaching style is leadership style. A number of teacher evaluation questionnaires were examined and were found to be asking questions identical in nature to the two leadership dimensions of Fleishman's Supervisory Behavior Description…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Touq, M. S.; Feldhusen, J. F. – College Student Journal, 1974
This research assessed the validity of student ratings of instructors. Results reveal some criterion-referenced validity for student ratings. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Research Projects
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hocking, Joan M. – College Student Journal, 1976
The purpose of this study was to determine how changes in students' grade expectations affect their evaluations of instructors and courses. Changes in student interest and expected grade in the course emerged as the most important determinants in changing the students' evaluations of the instructors and the courses. (Author)
Descriptors: College Instruction, College Students, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wright, Robert E. – College Student Journal, 2006
Student evaluations of instruction have long been used to evaluate the teaching performance of instructors. However, despite the widespread use of data from student evaluations for the purpose of determining faculty teaching effectiveness, a review of the literature in the area indicates that issues concerning the validity and usefulness of such…
Descriptors: Validity, College Students, College Faculty, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lavender, Abraham D. – College Student Journal, 1977
This paper finds that, in general, college students give lower ratings to professors with whom they have normative dissonance. It suggests that dissonance should be given more consideration, raising the possibility of "matching" students and professors. This would also increase the objectivity of student evaluations. (Author/BP)
Descriptors: Classroom Environment, Cognitive Style, College Students, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gulo, E. Vaughn – College Student Journal, 1973
This study represents an attempt to examine ways in which anxiety, achievement and affiliation motivation and dogmatism influence the academic performance of undergraduates under structured instructional conditions. Provides evidence for the notion that Ss' personality patterns do influence academic achievement under the conditions described in…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Instruction, Factor Analysis, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feldhusen, John F. – College Student Journal, 1976
Course and instructor evaluations are being used with increasing regularity in a variety of courses and disciplines. While this is encouraging for those interested in improving instruction, it has created confusion concerning interpretation and use of evaluation data. (Author/HMV)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Curry, Jerome – College Student Journal, 1976
How valid are subjective student evaluations of college instructions? An examination of my own experience and the experiences and controlled studies of other professionals suggest that subjective student evaluations demand a critical ability generally lacking in most college students, but particularly first- and second-year students. (Author)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, State of the Art Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arreola, Raoul A. – College Student Journal, 1973
Determines that the factor structure of the instructional model measured by the Michigan State University Student Instructional Rating System (SIRS) form could be replicated by an adapted version of the SIRS instrument at Florida State University. (Author)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Factor Structure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grandgenett, Donald J.; Kapel, David E. – College Student Journal, 1980
Students with good listening skills in selected areas may gravitate to particular fields. Listening may be a very crucial factor in terms of grades earned by students and how students evaluate their faculty. (Author)
Descriptors: College Curriculum, College Students, Faculty Evaluation, Grades (Scholastic)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gadzella, Bernadette M. – College Student Journal, 1977
Views of 3,670 students from six colleges and universities on most and least important traits of an ideal professor were analyzed. All data were collected with the same instrument. Data revealed students selected similar MOST and LEAST important traits of a quality professor. (Author)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Handleman, Chester – College Student Journal, 1977
While the practice of students evaluating their instructors has become common in many institutions of higher learning, and properly so, care should be taken that instructors who use both objective and subjective formats in their classroom testing not be disadvantaged as a result of this. (Author)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Faculty Evaluation, Objective Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bergman, Jerry – College Student Journal, 1980
Analyzes the process of making peer evaluations. Factors on which peer evaluation is based are extremely subjective and unconscious. Concludes that until peer rating systems are developed that are reliable and valid, their use should be strictly supplementary, or on an experimental basis. (Author)
Descriptors: Civil Rights Legislation, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Evaluation Criteria