Descriptor
Source
College Board Review | 20 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 13 |
Opinion Papers | 6 |
Reports - Descriptive | 5 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Parents | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Ireland | 1 |
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Naugle, W. Roy – College Board Review, 1972
Descriptors: Admission (School), College Applicants, Experimental Programs, Higher Education
Cole, John A. – College Board Review, 1971
Student suggests a standardized college admission application used by all colleges. (IR)
Descriptors: College Admission, College Applicants, Higher Education, Standards
Hetherington, Frank W. – College Board Review, 1974
At the University of Rochester, the Student Search Service of the College Entrance Examination Board identified able and interested students in a variety of regions interested in a number of academic programs to improve enrollment. (PG)
Descriptors: Admission (School), College Applicants, Educational Supply, Enrollment
Lucido, Jerome – College Board Review, 2002
The director of undergraduate admissions at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill discusses why the institution decided to end early admissions. The decision will benefit students and families of all background, he asserts. (EV)
Descriptors: Change, College Admission, College Applicants, Early Admission
Druesne, Barry; And Others – College Board Review, 1980
With the help of new marketing techniques, it is suggested that, admissions officers can better shape their applicant pool and influence who applies to their institutions. Ways to effectively campaign for more and better candidates are offered. A study of mailings based on a Student Search Service survey is described. (Author/MLW)
Descriptors: College Admission, College Applicants, Higher Education, Marketing
Barton, David W., Jr. – College Board Review, 1974
Presents the 7 reasons why students do not apply to college: unknown college, unimpressed by college's reputation, worried about location, too much emphasis on liberal arts, no flexibility in programs, too impersonal, and financial problems; and how to correct these problems in your school. (Author/PG)
Descriptors: Admission (School), College Applicants, Educational Supply, Higher Education
Bentz, Carlton L.; Huntley, Stirling L. – College Board Review, 1975
Directed to those responsible for college admission and placement functions in American colleges and universities, this article provides an overview, based on recent research, of the college selection and admission process experienced by graduates of overseas American-sponsored schools currently enrolled in institutions of higher learning across…
Descriptors: Admissions Counseling, College Admission, College Applicants, College Students
Evans, David L. – College Board Review, 1973
In an effort to provide wider access for all students, a program has been developed for minority students to have their admissions criteria entered into a pool of colleges that need students. In this manner, their chances of being suitably placed are vastly improved. (PG)
Descriptors: Admission (School), College Applicants, Competitive Selection, Disadvantaged
Fitt, Alfred B. – College Board Review, 1979
The filing of complicated applications for student financial aid is discussed and the complicated issues involved in improving the forms are addressed. Problems in "forms simplification" and "forms commonality" are described, and the need for a single need-analysis system is emphasized. (LBH)
Descriptors: Bureaucracy, College Applicants, Eligibility, Federal Aid
Stewart, Blair; Wishart, Patricia – College Board Review, 1971
A comparison of the Universities Central Council on Admissions (UCCA) and the Single Application Method (SAM). (IR)
Descriptors: Admission (School), Admission Criteria, College Admission, College Applicants
Perfetto, Greg – College Board Review, 2002
Uses the example of Vanderbilt University's predicted grade point average model to discuss the use of empirical criteria (such as high school grades and standardized test scores) within a comprehensive approach when predicting the future academic success of college applicants. (EV)
Descriptors: College Admission, College Applicants, Evaluation Criteria, Grade Point Average
Guildroy, Jack – College Board Review, 1981
The problems and special opportunities that face the college candidate with learning disabilities are discussed. It is suggested that Section 504 of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act has not succeeded in forcing the vast majority of colleges and universities to establish special programs for students with learning disabilities. (MLW)
Descriptors: Civil Rights Legislation, College Applicants, Counseling, Disability Discrimination
Li, Victor Hao – College Board Review, 1988
Among all college applicants, the disproportionate number of qualified Asian students presents special problems to admissions officers. There is the "model minority" segment and the underside--the economically and socially deprived who are candidates for affirmative action programs. (MLW)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Asian Americans, College Admission, College Applicants
Hassan, Thomas E. – College Board Review, 1987
Asian Americans are charging that the nation's most prestigious colleges are limiting their access with informal quotas. Admissions deans and directors must discard stereotypes, take steps to guarantee a more sensitive assessment of Asian-American applicants, and not cap admissions for that group. (MSE)
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, Asian Americans, College Admission, College Applicants
Ebel, Robert L. – College Board Review, 1982
The nation's best interests are served by selective admission to higher education. Selection should be based on scholastic aptitude, measured more accurately by combining high school grades and aptitude test scores than by either alone. Neither scores nor grades is flawless or badly flawed enough to be disregarded. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, Administrative Policy, Admission Criteria, College Admission
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1 | 2