NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Osiurak, Francois; Roche, Kevin; Ramone, Jennifer; Chainay, Hanna – Cognition, 2013
Jax and Buxbaum [Jax and Buxbaum (2010). Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. "Cognition, 115", 350-355] demonstrated that grasp-to-transport actions (handing an object to someone, i.e., a receiver) are initiated more quickly than grasp-to-use actions. A possible interpretation of…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Object Manipulation, Time, Replication (Evaluation)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Drew, Trafton; Horowitz, Todd S.; Vogel, Edward K. – Cognition, 2013
In the multiple object tracking task, participants are asked to keep targets separate from identical distractors as all items move randomly. It is well known that simple manipulations such as object speed and number of distractors dramatically alter the number of targets that are successfully tracked, but very little is known about what "causes"…
Descriptors: Attention, Experiments, Spatial Ability, Prediction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zhang, Hui; Mou, Weimin; McNamara, Timothy P. – Cognition, 2011
Three experiments examined the role of reference directions in spatial updating. Participants briefly viewed an array of five objects. A non-egocentric reference direction was primed by placing a stick under two objects in the array at the time of learning. After a short interval, participants detected which object had been moved at a novel view…
Descriptors: Experiments, Spatial Ability, Intervals, Test Results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Olofson, Eric L.; Baldwin, Dare – Cognition, 2011
We investigated infants' ability to recognize the similarity between observed and implied goals when actions differed in surface-level motion details. In two experiments, 10- to 12-month-olds were habituated to an actor manipulating an object and then shown test actions in which the actor contacted the object with a novel hand configuration that…
Descriptors: Infants, Motion, Object Manipulation, Experiments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beck, Sarah R.; Apperly, Ian A.; Chappell, Jackie; Guthrie, Carlie; Cutting, Nicola – Cognition, 2011
Tool making evidences intelligent, flexible thinking. In Experiment 1, we confirmed that 4- to 7-year-olds chose a hook tool to retrieve a bucket from a tube. In Experiment 2, 3- to 5-year-olds consistently failed to innovate a simple hook tool. Eight-year-olds performed at mature levels. In contrast, making a tool following demonstration was easy…
Descriptors: Experiments, Children, Thinking Skills, Age Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Casler, Krista; Kelemen, Deborah – Cognition, 2007
From the age of 2.5, children use social information to rapidly form enduring function-based artifact categories. The present study asked whether even younger children likewise constrain their use of objects according to teleo-functional beliefs that artifacts are "for" particular purposes, or whether they use objects as means to any desired end.…
Descriptors: Toddlers, Child Development, Child Behavior, Object Manipulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mendes, Natacha; Rakoczy, Hannes; Call, Josep – Cognition, 2008
Developmental research suggests that whereas very young infants individuate objects purely on spatiotemporal grounds, from (at latest) around 1 year of age children are capable of individuating objects according to the kind they belong to and the properties they instantiate. As the latter ability has been found to correlate with language, some…
Descriptors: Linguistics, Infants, Primatology, Developmental Stages
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Plunkett, Kim; Hu, Jon-Fan; Cohen, Leslie B. – Cognition, 2008
An extensive body of research claims that labels facilitate categorisation, highlight the commonalities between objects and act as invitations to form categories for young infants before their first birthday. While this may indeed be a reasonable claim, we argue that it is not justified by the experiments described in the research. We report on a…
Descriptors: Cartoons, Infants, Classification, Merchandise Information
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hare, Brian; Call, Josep; Tomasello, Michael – Cognition, 2006
There is little experimental evidence that any non-human species is capable of purposefully attempting to manipulate the psychological states of others deceptively (e.g., manipulating what another sees). We show here that chimpanzees, one of humans' two closest primate relatives, sometimes attempt to actively conceal things from others.…
Descriptors: Animals, Comparative Analysis, Object Manipulation, Food
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Feldman, Jacob; Tremoulet, Patrice D. – Cognition, 2006
How does an observer decide that a particular object viewed at one time is actually the "same" object as one viewed at a different time? We explored this question using an experimental task in which an observer views two objects as they simultaneously approach an occluder, disappear behind the occluder, and re-emerge from behind the occluder,…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Object Manipulation, Spatial Ability, Visual Discrimination
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Myung, Jong-yoon; Blumstein, Sheila E.; Sedivy, Julie C. – Cognition, 2006
Two experiments investigated sensory/motor-based functional knowledge of man-made objects: manipulation features associated with the actual usage of objects. In Experiment 1, a series of prime-target pairs was presented auditorily, and participants were asked to make a lexical decision on the target word. Participants made a significantly faster…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Cognitive Processes, Word Recognition, Object Manipulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Grieve, Robert; And Others – Cognition, 1977
The ability of two and three-year-old children to comprehend the prepositions in, on, and under was tested. Results suggest that the young child's comprehension of locative instructions involves an interaction between aspects of the instruction's word meanings, word order, and the child's understanding of the context. (Author/MV)
Descriptors: Comprehension, Intellectual Development, Listening Comprehension, Object Manipulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Altmann, Gerry T. M. – Cognition, 2004
The "visual world paradigm" typically involves presenting participants with a visual scene and recording eye movements as they either hear an instruction to manipulate objects in the scene or as they listen to a description of what may happen to those objects. In this study, participants heard each target sentence only after the corresponding…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Object Manipulation, Sentences, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kobayashi, Harumi – Cognition, 1998
Examined whether 2-year-olds can learn a novel part name of an unfamiliar object when adult demonstrates action upon object. Asked 24 Japanese 2-year-olds to choose referent for a whole object and part of the object in forced choice tests. Found that young children are able to override whole object assumption when actions of parts of objects are…
Descriptors: Classification, Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Development, Correlation