Two Unargued Linguistic Assumptions in Kean's "Phonological" Interpretation of Agrammatism.

Klosek, John

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ205639

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1979-Mar

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Two Unargued Linguistic Assumptions in Kean's "Phonological" Interpretation of Agrammatism.

Klosek, John

Cognition, v7 n1 p61-68 Mar 1979

Two claims essential to Kean's interpretation (EJ 165 107) that Broca's aphasia results in a phonological disorder rather than a syntactic or morphological disorder are disputed. The claim that the plural morpheme is derivational, and the postulation of the notion of the phonological word are shown to have no linguistic motivation. (Author/RD)

Descriptors: Aphasia, Linguistic Difficulty (Inherent), Morphophonemics, Phonemes, Plurals, Research Reviews (Publications), Speech, Syntax, Traditional Grammar

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Information Analyses

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A