Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Verbs | 3 |
Dutch | 2 |
Language Processing | 2 |
Syntax | 2 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
Grammar | 1 |
Idioms | 1 |
Morphemes | 1 |
Research Design | 1 |
Research Methodology | 1 |
Research Problems | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Cognition | 3 |
Author
Frazier, Lyn | 3 |
Carminati, Maria Nella | 1 |
Cook, Anne E. | 1 |
Majewski, Helen | 1 |
Rayner, Keith | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Frazier, Lyn; Carminati, Maria Nella; Cook, Anne E.; Majewski, Helen; Rayner, Keith – Cognition, 2006
An eye movement study of temporarily ambiguous closure sentences confirmed that the early closure penalty in a sentence like "While John hunted the frightened deer escaped" is larger for a simple past verb ("hunted") than for a past progressive verb ("was hunting"). The results can be explained by the observation that simple past tense verbs…
Descriptors: Semantics, Syntax, Eye Movements, Structural Analysis (Linguistics)

Frazier, Lyn – Cognition, 1995
Responds to a commentary in this issue by Kempen on an experiment by Frazier and others involving Dutch-language lexical processing. Postulates that it is unclear control items were open to complex verbal analysis; more research is needed to determine how the verb "hebben" is interpreted in context; and Kempen's account of the results is…
Descriptors: Dutch, Language Processing, Research Methodology, Verbs

Frazier, Lyn – Cognition, 1995
Discusses a 1993 study by Frazier, d'Arcais, and Coolen intended to test Schreuder's (1990) Morphological Integration model concerning the processing of separable and inseparable verbs, and attempts to refute Kempen's objections to their interpretation of the experimental results in this issue. (DR)
Descriptors: Dutch, Grammar, Idioms, Research Design