NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 46 to 60 of 71 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gaede, Owen F. – Clearing House, 1978
Presents recent research data which strongly support the widely held intuitive feeling that beginning teachers find the first year of teaching to be one of severe disillusionment. (Author)
Descriptors: Beginning Teachers, Educational Research, Flow Charts, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Watman, Thomas J. – Clearing House, 1972
This article illustrates several techniques to assist teachers in objectively evaluating what is going on in their classroom. (Author)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Classroom Observation Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Interaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wagoner, Roderic L. – Clearing House, 1969
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Competition, Incentives, Merit Rating
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Arth, Alfred A.; And Others – Clearing House, 1980
The authors discuss "evaluation paranoia" as a fact of life for students and educators. By grades or job evaluations, both are pressured into conformity through fear of the evaluator. Suggested is a new conception of evaluation, based on self-appraisal and mutual goal setting, to promote honesty and personal growth. (SJL)
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Conformity, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Galluzzo, Gary R. – Clearing House, 2005
simple wedge with its tip made of durable, clear, and appropriate teaching standards forged in the furnace of science and theory widens to bring the materials and processes of art and practice to bear on the work of strengthening and renewing all of teaching by applying the national board's standards and assessment processes. With this model,…
Descriptors: Holistic Approach, National Standards, Preservice Teacher Education, Faculty Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wickert, Donald M. – Clearing House, 1987
Focuses on issues regarding the training of administrators in evaluation processes and the use of teacher evaluations for growth potential as well as termination. (JC)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Evaluation Criteria, Improvement Programs, Inservice Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Di Geronimo, Joe – Clearing House, 1985
Describes the program developed by one California school district to meet the requirements of legislation concerning the training and evaluation of probationary staff. (FL)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Probationary Period
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCarty, Donald J.; And Others – Clearing House, 1986
Reports the findings of a study that assessed teachers' perceptions of (1) how and when they were supervised or evaluated, (2) what effect teacher unions had on these processes, (3) how they learned how well they were doing in the classroom, and (4) what direct or indirect effects supervision or evaluation had on their teaching activities. (HOD)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Perception
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Goldman, Jeri J. – Clearing House, 1983
Reviews Douglas McGregor's "Theory X" and "Theory Y" views of teacher supervision. Concludes that supervisors need to understand the personal belief systems of the teachers they are supervising. (FL)
Descriptors: Administrative Principles, Administrator Role, Beliefs, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wedman, John – Clearing House, 1982
Presents a theoretical construct of teacher supervision within the time constraints common to most principals. Offers suggestions for modifying the preconference, observation, postconference cycle of teacher evaluation to make it more efficient and effective. (FL)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Conflict Resolution, Efficiency, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Feldvebel, Alexander M. – Clearing House, 1980
Reviewed is literature on teacher evaluation. It is suggested that evaluation frequently arouses fear and activates defensiveness on the part of teachers. Some of the alternatives to resolve this dilemma are described. (KC)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pecheone, Raymond L.; Pigg, Matthew J.; Chung, Ruth R.; Souviney, Randall J. – Clearing House, 2005
This article explores the learning opportunities that standards-based portfolio assessment offers to promote teacher and faculty learning in teacher education. It discusses the impact on learning from two perspectives: that of teacher candidates and faculty using a paper-and-pencil approach for portfolio development, mentoring, and scoring; and…
Descriptors: Portfolios (Background Materials), Teacher Effectiveness, Standards, Portfolio Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kult, Lawrence E. – Clearing House, 1978
The author considers five of the most prevalent faults attributed to the process of teacher evaluation by principals and some criticisms resulting from an analysis of those faults. Twenty-five suggestions for improvements in the evaluation process and some examples of inappropriate comments made by principals are given. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Qualifications, Critical Thinking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mickler, Mary Louise – Clearing House, 1987
Discusses the cases for and against merit pay for teachers and concludes that the number of failures in using merit pay far outweigh the successes. (JC)
Descriptors: Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Incentives, Job Satisfaction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Roy, Joseph J. – Clearing House, 1979
There are not enough incompetent teachers around to warrant building evaluation systems solely to get rid of them. To be effective in terms of increasing student learning, teacher evaluation programs should focus on helping competent teachers become better. The individualized performance objective or job target approach can do this. (SJL)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Needs, Individualized Programs
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5