Descriptor
Source
| Clearing House | 7 |
Author
| Gee, Thomas C. | 1 |
| Hallaman, D. G. | 1 |
| Kerewsky, Bill | 1 |
| McIntyre, John | 1 |
| Orlich, Donald C. | 1 |
| Watson, Edward D. | 1 |
| Weller, L. David | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMcIntyre, John – Clearing House, 1979
The author suggests a simple three-stage model as a guideline for systematic curriculum evaluation: evaluation of goals; collection, organization, and analysis of data; and decision making. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Curriculum Evaluation, Data Analysis, Data Collection
Peer reviewedOrlich, Donald C. – Clearing House, 1989
Discusses four decision-making models and applies them to the evaluation of staff development programs. (SR)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Inservice Education, Models
Peer reviewedWeller, L. David; And Others – Clearing House, 1983
Proposes a data-based method for curriculum development that clearly displays priorities, provides a sound base for making curriculum decisions, and helps in eliminating community misunderstandings regarding those decisions (FL)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Data Analysis, Decision Making, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedWatson, Edward D. – Clearing House, 1986
Offers 10 suggestions to help teachers avoid the pitfalls encountered by unknowing software purchasers. Suggestions include checking for compatibility, determining objectives, testing for material sequence, and reading the documentation. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Software, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedKerewsky, Bill – Clearing House, 1985
Describes the planning and implementation of a one-day program in which teachers, students, administrators, and community members worked together to find ways of improving a school. Provides examples of the positive outcomes of the program. (FL)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Improvement, Educational Planning, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedHallaman, D. G. – Clearing House, 1975
An Urban Affairs Supervisor sarcastically presented suggestions for use by administrators in developing their professional polish. (RK)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Guides, Administrator Qualifications, Administrator Role
Peer reviewedGee, Thomas C. – Clearing House, 1977
Describes a language-arts assignment for a group of 7th and 8th grade students. Its intent was to impress the inter-relatedness of the separate language-arts skills upon students and to inspire them to produce a colorful and purposeful presentation of their writing ability. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Decision Making, Elementary School Students, Language Arts
