Descriptor
Source
Change | 5 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Lovett, Clara M. – Change, 2002
Explores how U.S. higher education's number one position over the last century is threatened as institutions struggle to deal with rising expectations from students and employers, which are producing chronic fiscal problems feared to be eroding the quality of teaching and research. (EV)
Descriptors: Competition, Educational Finance, Educational Quality, Educational Trends

Basu, Janet Else – Change, 1984
Stanford and the University of California at Berkeley operate in a spirit of cooperation that is unique for a public and a private university. Cuts in either research or student aid could seriously harm both institutions. (MLW)
Descriptors: Competition, Educational Finance, Educational Quality, Futures (of Society)

Finn, Chester E., Jr. – Change, 1984
While the primary issue in the future of college student financial aid, pertaining especially to the role of the College Scholarship Service, is fairness in awarding aid in the context of extreme college aid competition, other issues include college quality and choice, who should pay for education, parental responsibility, educational…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Agency Role, College Choice, Competition

Kuh, George D. – Change, 1980
An alternative view to a 1979 study on institutional quality done by Astin and Solomon is presented. The study indicates significant changes in rank have occurred among the 25 most selective four-year undergraduate institutions. Kuh proposes naturalistic inquiry research. A rebuttal by Astin is appended. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Academic Achievement, Achievement Rating, College Bound Students

McPherson, Michael – Change, 1981
Public v private competition for students and ways that institutions and policymakers should deal with it are discussed. Private institutions vulnerable to competition from the public sector, how private institutions can survive, the tuition gap, and planning policies of public higher education are described. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Planning, Competition, Educational Quality, Enrollment Trends