Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Academic Achievement | 3 |
Achievement Gains | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
Mathematics Achievement | 3 |
Reading Achievement | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Trend Analysis | 3 |
Educational Improvement | 2 |
Educational Indicators | 2 |
Educational Policy | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Center on Education Policy | 3 |
Author
Publication Type
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Iowa | 3 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 2 |
Iowa Tests of Educational… | 2 |
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Center on Education Policy, 2010
This paper profiles Iowa's test score trends through 2008-09. Between 2005 and 2009, the percentages of students reaching the proficient level on the state test and the basic level on NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress) increased in grade 4 reading and math and in grade 8 math. In grade 8 reading, the percentage of students reaching…
Descriptors: State Standards, Academic Achievement, Scores, Grade 4
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This general achievement trends profile includes information that the Center on Education Policy (CEP) and the Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO) obtained from states from fall 2008 through April 2009. Included herein are: (1) Bullet points summarizing key findings about achievement trends in that state at three performance…
Descriptors: Grades (Scholastic), Federal Legislation, Testing Programs, Academic Achievement
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students