Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
Center on Education Policy | 7 |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 5 |
High Schools | 5 |
Secondary Education | 5 |
Elementary Education | 3 |
Grade 10 | 3 |
Grade 4 | 3 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Grade 12 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Florida | 7 |
Illinois | 2 |
New York | 2 |
Arkansas | 1 |
California | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Louisiana | 1 |
Maryland | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
North Carolina | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 6 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Florida Comprehensive… | 2 |
ACT Assessment | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Riddle, Wayne; Kober, Nancy – Center on Education Policy, 2011
When Congress reauthorizes the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), much of the debate will undoubtedly focus on the accountability requirements added to Title I by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Title I authorizes federal aid to school districts to educate low-achieving children in low-income areas. Among the most…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Federal Aid, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation
Center on Education Policy, 2011
This individual profile provides information on Florida's high school exit exam standards and policies. Some of the categories presented include: (1) State exit exam policy; (2) Type of Test; (3) Purpose; (4) Major changes in exit exam policy since the 2009-10 school year for financial reasons; (5) Subjects tested on exam; (6) Grade exam first…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Alignment (Education)
Scott, Caitlin – Center on Education Policy, 2009
In March 2008, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) launched a competition for states to submit proposals to participate in a Differentiated Accountability Pilot program. The stated aim of the pilots was to allow participating states "to vary the intensity and type of interventions to match the academic reasons that led to a school's…
Descriptors: Needs Assessment, Federal Legislation, School Support, Politics of Education
Center on Education Policy, 2010
This paper provides information about the Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test[R] (FCAT). The purpose of the exam is to: (1) Determine prospective high school graduates' mastery of the state curriculum; (2) Encourage districts and schools to identify and serve students at risk of academic failure; (3) Provide data to state policymakers on student…
Descriptors: State Standards, Academic Failure, At Risk Students, High School Graduates
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This general achievement trends profile includes information that the Center on Education Policy (CEP) and the Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO) obtained from states from fall 2008 through April 2009. Included herein are: (1) Bullet points summarizing key findings about achievement trends in that state at three performance…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Testing, Academic Achievement, Effect Size
Center on Education Policy, 2010
In grade 8 (the only grade in which subgroup trends were analyzed by achievement level), Florida students showed gains almost across the board in both reading and math at the basic, proficient, and advanced levels for racial/ethnic subgroups, low income students, and boys and girls. Progress has been made in narrowing achievement gaps in both…
Descriptors: Achievement Gap, Achievement Gains, Reading Achievement, Mathematics Achievement
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students