NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
DiBernardino, Frank J.; Mead, Paul D. – CUPA Journal, 1988
Strategic benefit planning is a management process that establishes overall objectives that form the basis for decision making on all elements of indirect compensation. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 and implications to tax-sheltered annuities are discussed. An example of a statement of university policy on employee benefits is appended. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Planning, Colleges, Finance Reform, Fringe Benefits
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Daniels, Craig E.; Daniels, Janet D. – CUPA Journal, 1992
Discussion of college faculty retirement benefits looks at trends in early and delayed retirement among faculty and the general population, public policy affecting retirement, a study of college pension plans, and a survey on retiree health benefits. Development of organizational climate where retirement is viewed as normal and attractive is…
Descriptors: Administrative Policy, College Administration, College Faculty, Health Insurance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morrell, Louis – CUPA Journal, 1987
Institutions must provide good counseling regarding retirement program benefits, since when in doubt about their financial position faculty members are inclined to remain employed. Colleges should consider offering nonfinancial incentives for early retirement as well as financial. (MLW)
Descriptors: Access to Information, College Faculty, Early Retirement, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brewer, Katherine – CUPA Journal, 1989
New federal laws and regulations, particularly non-discrimination rules, concerning welfare plans, fringe benefits, and tax-sheltered annuities are examined, and new law and regulatory developments concerning pensions are highlighted. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Discriminatory Legislation, Eligibility, Employers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gulledge, Dexter E.; Campbell, David P. – CUPA Journal, 1994
Information on retirement investment planning is provided for college and university human resource managers, focusing on what employees need to know about maximizing contributions to the 403(b) plan without becoming liable for penalties for excessive savings. Calculations are explained and illustrated with a hypothetical case and data charts.…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Role, Federal Regulation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morrell, Louis R. – CUPA Journal, 1994
In retirement planning, the college or university human resources manager is positioned as representative of both the college administration, which has a simple legal obligation to employees, and employees, who must plan for financial security and independence. This administrator can affect employees' financial well-being by effective retirement…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Administration, Conflict Resolution, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Morrell, Louis R. – CUPA Journal, 1988
The new financial environment for retirement emerging in the 1980s is marked by increased individual responsibility for financial well-being, a changed workforce, and the need to contain costs. The trend will be away from the group approach and toward cafeteria-style benefit programs, providing greater freedom of benefit choice. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Compensation (Remuneration), Economic Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chronister, Jay L.; Reed, Kathrine M. – CUPA Journal, 1994
The University of Virginia's retirement incentive program for older, full-time, tenured faculty provided two options: phased retirement and a retirement decision contract establishing a firm retirement date. Evaluation indicates this plan was effective in meeting the interests and needs of participants and the institution and saved institutional…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Early Retirement, Full Time Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Schoenfeld, Clay – CUPA Journal, 1993
Changes in retirement patterns at colleges and universities can be expected because of demographic reasons and because of federal and state legislation uncapping mandatory retirement. Institutional policies that will encourage reluctant older faculty to retire need to address the three fundamental components of successful employee retirement: (1)…
Descriptors: Administrators, Age Discrimination, Aging in Academia, College Administration