Descriptor
| College Administration | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Retirement Benefits | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Age Discrimination | 1 |
| Aging in Academia | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Costs | 1 |
| Discriminatory Legislation | 1 |
| Eligibility | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| CUPA Journal | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBrewer, Katherine – CUPA Journal, 1989
New federal laws and regulations, particularly non-discrimination rules, concerning welfare plans, fringe benefits, and tax-sheltered annuities are examined, and new law and regulatory developments concerning pensions are highlighted. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Discriminatory Legislation, Eligibility, Employers
Peer reviewedSchoenfeld, Clay – CUPA Journal, 1993
Changes in retirement patterns at colleges and universities can be expected because of demographic reasons and because of federal and state legislation uncapping mandatory retirement. Institutional policies that will encourage reluctant older faculty to retire need to address the three fundamental components of successful employee retirement: (1)…
Descriptors: Administrators, Age Discrimination, Aging in Academia, College Administration
