Instructional strategies based on a portrait painting of Francisco Goya introduce primary grade students to the idea that portraits are pictures of people. Students also develop an awareness that the visual vocabulary of color, shape, line, texture, and the quality of brushstrokes can communicate feelings and ideas. (RM)

Instructional strategies based on a portrait painting of Jean-Baptiste Oudry familiarize intermediate grade students with the techniques of portraiture and introduce the characteristics of eighteenth-century French rococo painting. (RM)

Five reasons art education is important for all students are discussed. They are: (1) art as basic education, (2) creativity, (3) aesthetic experience, (4) art appreciation, and (5) historical understanding. (RM)

Finding "aesthetic experience" to be a difficult and paradoxical concept, the author argues that a social as well as an historical perspective may be a more beneficial route for the future of art programs in our schools. (Author/SJL)

The instructional strategies suggested use a work of one of Mexico's most celebrated political history painters, David Siqueiros, to introduce junior high students to formal qualities in portraiture and contemporary Mexican art history. (RM)

Instructional strategies introduce students in grades 10-12 to the stylistic characteristics and portraiture technique of Mary Cassatt and help them understand Cassatt's relationship to work of other Impressionist painters. (RM)

The development of art is an aspect of our American heritage that deserves recognition as an important area of education. The importance of art heritage curriculum and the aesthetic education it offers students is outlined. (Author/RK)

Describes, compares, and evaluates examples of first generation elementary and junior high curriculum resources which are based upon the discipline based approach to art education. Offers these as sound, sequential instructional materials that are useful in the areas of art history, art criticism, aesthetics, and art studio. (KO)

Reports the results of a survey of 146 junior and senior high school teachers' experiences in teaching art history. Includes data on art history teaching preparation, how teachers typically include art history in their classes, and teachers' perceptions of resources which help them teach art history. (JDH)

Proposes an alternative to discipline-based art education (DBAE) called Aesthetic Response Theory (A*R*T*). Reviews problems of DBAE and outlines a curriculum based on the A*R*T* alternative. Concludes that the A*R*T* approach makes the serious study of art more feasible for classroom teachers. (BR)

Examines the five progressive stages of Michael Parson's model for understanding aesthetic development: (1) favoritism; (2) beauty and realism; (3) expressiveness; (4) style and form; and (5) autonomy. Argues that the model can be applied to all ages. Uses Parsons' model to show how a congresswoman's level of aesthetic development can influence…

Presents lesson plans for grades K-3 based on 4 well-known paintings Discusses historical background and cultural impact of the paintings. Provides student activities and assessment suggestions. (CFR)

Questions whether art educators are using outmoded, traditional methods in a nontraditional world. Contends that teachers must be appreciative of art's eclectic nature and its ability to help students understand contemporary society. Asserts that the relationship between the art teacher and the student must be both active and reflective. (CFR)

Proposes an art curriculum framework that reduces aesthetics to three theories of art: imitationalist, formalist, and emotionalist. Fits each theory into the curriculum at the appropriate developmental stage of the student. Applies these theories to art criticism, art history, and studio production. (LS)

Contends that Discipline Based Art Education (DBAE) upholds and exemplifies a tradition that supports the male-dominated status quo in art education. Presents gender-biased quotes from various theorists and philosophers whose works form the foundation of DBAE. Concludes by showing how feminism may strengthen arguments for DBAE. (JDH)