NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sackett, Paul R.; Borneman, Matthew J.; Connelly; Brian S. – American Psychologist, 2008
The authors review criticisms commonly leveled against cognitively loaded tests used for employment and higher education admissions decisions, with a focus on large-scale databases and meta-analytic evidence. They conclude that (a) tests of developed abilities are generally valid for their intended uses in predicting a wide variety of aspects of…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Higher Education, College Entrance Examinations, Occupational Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
London, Manuel; Bray, Douglas W. – American Psychologist, 1980
Reviews sources prescribing ethical personnel practices and discusses ethical obligations of psychologists and employers. Suggests research for resolving ethical issues and dealing with conflicting rights. (Author)
Descriptors: Adults, Codes of Ethics, Employers, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bersoff, Donald N. – American Psychologist, 1981
Examines the legal issues concerning (1) cultural bias in educational tests; (2) the validity of employment tests; and (3) the disclosure of test materials. Discusses the legal interpretations of psychometric concepts that have arisen from recent litigation. (Author/GC)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Cultural Differences, Disclosure, Educational Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Shimberg, Benjamin – American Psychologist, 1981
The purpose of licensing and certification tests is to protect the public. This purpose determines test content, difficulty of the items, test format, use of test scores in decision making, and ways of setting standards. Currently being explored are methods to ensure continued competence, and legal considerations related to antidiscrimination…
Descriptors: Certification, Court Litigation, Legal Problems, Occupational Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Novick, Melvin R. – American Psychologist, 1981
Examines the role of government agencies, professional standards, and federal and state legislation in: (1) determining the quality of ability tests; (2) resolving imbalances and conflicts among participants in the testing process; and (3) defining fairness and due process. (Author/GC)
Descriptors: Ability, Competence, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Federal Government
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barrett, Gerald V.; Depinet, Robert L. – American Psychologist, 1991
Examines five themes in "Testing for Competence Rather than for "Intelligence" (D. C. McClelland, "American Psychologist," 1973), and reviews relevant literature. Despite wide acceptance of McClelland's views, other evidence that does not show that competency testing surpasses cognitive ability testing in predicting…
Descriptors: Ability, Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Tests, Intelligence