NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Teo, Thomas – American Psychologist, 2012
According to the philosophers of science Hempel and Oppenheim (1948), who were cited appropriately by Lilienfeld (see record 2011-12007-001) in his article, scientific explanations serve to answer "why" questions. Clarifying the logic of explanations in the sciences, they developed famously the notion that phenomena can be explained (using…
Descriptors: Psychology, Scientific Principles, Scientific Methodology, Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tryon, Warren W. – American Psychologist, 2009
The first recommendation Kazdin made for advancing the psychotherapy research knowledge base, improving patient care, and reducing the gulf between research and practice was to study the mechanisms of therapeutic change. He noted, "The study of mechanisms of change has received the least attention even though understanding mechanisms may well be…
Descriptors: Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy, Reader Response, Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Haeffel, Gerald J.; Thiessen, Erik D.; Campbell, Matthew W.; Kaschak, Michael P.; McNeil, Nicole M. – American Psychologist, 2009
Comments on an article by J. J. Arnett regarding the assertion that American psychology focuses too narrowly on Americans while neglecting the other 95% of the world's population. The authors agree with Arnett's call for greater attention to this issue. However, they fundamentally disagree with his position on issues related to generalizability…
Descriptors: Criticism, Cultural Context, Social Theories, Cultural Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Helms, Janet E. – American Psychologist, 2009
In defending tests of cognitive abilities, knowledge, or skills (CAKS) from the skepticism of their "family members, friends, and neighbors" and aiding psychologists forced to defend tests from "myth and hearsay" in their own skeptical social networks (p. 215), Sackett, Borneman, and Connelly focused on evaluating validity coefficients, racial or…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Cognitive Ability, Error of Measurement, Test Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kaufman, James C.; Agars, Mark D. – American Psychologist, 2009
Sackett, Borneman, and Connelly argued that several common criticisms of cognitively laden tests are not well supported by the literature. The authors' systematic exploration of research surrounding seven specific criticisms is laudable, and we do not find fault with their conclusions as presented. In evaluating the seven concerns, however, the…
Descriptors: Creativity, Cognitive Ability, Predictor Variables, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fischer, Kurt W.; Stein, Zachary; Heikkinen, Katie – American Psychologist, 2009
Intellectual and psychosocial functioning develop along complex learning pathways. Steinberg, Cauffman, Woolard, Graham, and Banich measured these two classes of abilities with narrow, biased assessments that captured only a segment of each pathway and created misleading age patterns based on ceiling and floor effects. It is a simple matter to…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Adolescent Development, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Steinberg, Laurence; Cauffman, Elizabeth; Woolard, Jennifer; Graham, Sandra; Banich, Marie – American Psychologist, 2009
The authors respond to both the general and specific concerns raised in Fischer, Stein, and Heikkinen's commentary on their article (Steinberg, Cauffman, Woolard, Graham, & Banich), in which they drew on studies of adolescent development to justify the American Psychological Association's positions in two Supreme Court cases involving the…
Descriptors: Adolescent Development, Maturity (Individuals), Court Litigation, Reader Response
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Spelke, Elizabeth S.; Grace, Ariel D. – American Psychologist, 2006
Responds to the comments of P. L. Ackerman (see record EJ751362), D. Y. Dai (see record EJ751364), and M. C. Gridley (see record EJ751365) on E. S. Spelke's original article "Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review" (see record EJ733610). Here, the current authors first consider Ackerman's…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement, Gender Differences, Intelligence Quotient, Criticism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lippa, Richard A. – American Psychologist, 2006
Comments on the article by J. S. Hyde (see record 2005-11115-001), in which Hyde reviewed meta-analytic evidence on gender differences and concluded that most psychological gender differences are in the close-to-zero or small range. The current author notes some omissions from Hyde's review, including the findings through other research large…
Descriptors: Psychological Studies, Gender Differences, Reader Response, Meta Analysis