Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 29 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 111 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 253 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 562 |
Descriptor
Source
American Journal of Evaluation | 764 |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 8 |
Media Staff | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Canada | 18 |
United States | 11 |
California | 10 |
Netherlands | 10 |
New Zealand | 8 |
United Kingdom | 7 |
Africa | 6 |
Asia | 6 |
Australia | 5 |
Denmark | 5 |
Germany | 5 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Older Americans Act 1965 | 1 |
Personal Responsibility and… | 1 |
Workforce Investment Act 1998 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Bayley Scales of Infant… | 1 |
Facts on Aging Quiz | 1 |
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Froncek, Benjamin; Rohmann, Anette – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
Practical-participatory evaluation is often considered an effective approach to enhancing evaluation use. Despite this generally positive connotation, potential negative effects of participatory evaluation have also been discussed in the literature but never empirically investigated before. Drawing upon the social--psychological procedural justice…
Descriptors: Participation, Evaluation, Stakeholders, Justice
Harris, Kevin; Oatley, Chad; Mumford, Steven; Pham, Phung K.; Nunns, Heather – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
This method note presents Q methodology as a useful tool for evaluators to add to their practice toolbox. Q methodology, which involves both quantitative and qualitative techniques, can help researchers and evaluators systematically understand subjectivity and the communicability of opinions and perspectives. We first provide an overview of Q…
Descriptors: Q Methodology, Program Evaluation, Foreign Countries, Stakeholders
Kainz, Kirsten; Metz, Allison; Yazejian, Noreen – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
Large-scale education interventions aimed at diminishing disparities and generating equitable learning outcomes are often complex, involving multiple components and intended impacts. Evaluating implementation of complex interventions is challenging because of the interactive and emergent nature of intervention components. Methods that build from…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Intervention, Program Implementation, Systems Approach
Archibald, Thomas – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Problem definition in program planning and evaluation is rarely problematized. In this article, I discuss why the lack of problem problematization is itself problematic--in other words, why treating problems as self-evident can pose a risk for evaluation practice. Then, to help avoid such risks, I suggest Carol Bacchi's "What's the Problem…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Criticism, Problems, Program Evaluation
Alkin, Marvin C.; King, Jean A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
The second article in this series on the history of evaluation use has three sections. The first and longest develops a functional definition of the term "use," noting that a thorough definition of evaluation use includes the initial stimulus (i.e., evaluation findings or process), the user, the way people use the information, the aspect…
Descriptors: Definitions, Users (Information), Ethics, Evaluation
Pann, James M.; DiLuzio, Elizabeth; Coghlan, Anne T.; Hughes, Scott D. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This article explores the utility of mindfulness in the field of evaluation. Mindfulness is a translation of the ancient Indian word, "Sati," which means awareness, attention, and remembering. While definitions vary, a practical definition of mindfulness is present-moment awareness in an open and nonjudgmental manner. Mindfulness-based…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Educational Practices, Metacognition, Evaluators
Chen, Huey T.; Morosanu, Liliana; Bellury, Lanell M.; Kimble, Laura – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
This study was a formative evaluation of a retention program for nursing students from disadvantaged backgrounds underrepresented in the nursing workforce. The program was challenging, with multilevel interventions, some implemented sequential and some concurrently. The program team was interested to identify problematic components and address…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Program Evaluation, Nursing Students, Minority Group Students
Carey, Timothy A.; Fauth, James M.; Tremblay, George C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Despite enduring and unacceptable disparities in health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians as well as people living in rural and remote locations, evidence indicates that health services are not routinely evaluated. This article describes an exploration of a context where evaluators and community partners have achieved…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Indigenous Populations, Rural Population, Health Services
Svensson, Kate; Szijarto, Barbara; Milley, Peter; Cousins, J. Bradley – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Social innovations (SIs) frequently bring previously unrelated actors, ideas, and practices together in new configurations with the goal of addressing social needs. However, the dizzying variety of definitions of SI and their dynamic, exploratory character raise dilemmas for evaluators tasked with their evaluations. This article is based on a…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Innovation, Evaluation Research, Comparative Analysis
Atkinson, John; Lasbennes, Florence; Nabarro, David – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
We present this brief reflection on key aspects of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the implications of the worldwide focus on achieving the sustainable development goals as external observers of the evaluation endeavor around the world. We have conducted and participated in evaluations, but it is not our primary field of work and…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Sustainability, Sustainable Development, Transformational Leadership
Richardson, Emma Z. L.; Phillips, Mary; Colom, Alejandra; Nichols, Jennica – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
Program participants have been largely excluded as an evidence source in realist evaluations. We test whether and how lived experience as described through life history interviews with pilot program participants can be used as a valid and unique source of data for elucidating context (C)--mechanism (M)--outcome (O) configurations and informing…
Descriptors: Experience, Autobiographies, Personal Narratives, Evaluation Methods
Renger, Ralph; Renger, Jessica; Basson, Marc D.; Van Eck, Richard N.; Renger, Jirina; Souvannasacd, Eric; Hart, Gary – American Journal of Evaluation, 2021
This article shares lessons learned in applying system evaluation theory (SET) to evaluate a Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTR) funded by the National Institutes of Health. After describing how CTR support cores are intended to work interdependently as a system, the case is made for SET as the best fit for evaluating this evaluand.…
Descriptors: Systems Approach, Evaluation, Theories, Cancer
Stelmach, Rachel D.; Fitch, Elizabeth; Chen, Molly; Meekins, Meagan; Flueckiger, Rebecca M.; Colaço, Rajeev – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
Monitoring, evaluation, and research activities generate important data, but they often fail to change policies or programs. In addition, local program staff and partners often feel disconnected from these activities, which undermines their ownership of data and results. To bridge the gaps between monitoring, evaluation, and research and to give…
Descriptors: Evidence Based Practice, Evaluation, Research, Global Approach
Picciotto, Robert – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Evaluators have been slow to "plug" into the digital world, let alone engage with the strategic implications of the Big Data revolution for the evaluation discipline. Yet, Big Data holds enormous promise for extending the reach and improving the quality of evaluation practice. Equally, systematic recourse to evaluation would greatly…
Descriptors: Data, Evaluation, Data Use, Change
Lemire, Colombe; Rousseau, Michel; Dionne, Carmen – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
Implementation fidelity is the degree of compliance with which the core elements of program or intervention practices are used as intended. The scientific literature reveals gaps in defining and assessing implementation fidelity in early intervention: lack of common definitions and conceptual framework as well as their lack of application. Through…
Descriptors: Early Intervention, Fidelity, Program Implementation, Compliance (Legal)