NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
American Journal of Evaluation58
Audience
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 31 to 45 of 58 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mueller, Christoph Emanuel; Gaus, Hansjoerg; Rech, Joerg – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
This article proposes an innovative approach to estimating the counterfactual without the necessity of generating information from either a control group or a before-measure. Building on the idea that program participants are capable of estimating the hypothetical state they would be in had they not participated, the basics of the Roy-Rubin model…
Descriptors: Research Design, Program Evaluation, Research Methodology, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pituch, Keenan A.; Whittaker, Tiffany A.; Chang, Wanchen – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
Use of multivariate analysis (e.g., multivariate analysis of variance) is common when normally distributed outcomes are collected in intervention research. However, when mixed responses--a set of normal and binary outcomes--are collected, standard multivariate analyses are no longer suitable. While mixed responses are often obtained in…
Descriptors: Intervention, Multivariate Analysis, Mixed Methods Research, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ong-Dean, Colin; Hofstetter, Carolyn Huie; Strick, Betsy R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
In the contentious debate over the use of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in education research, little attention has been given to how methodological issues arise and/or are resolved in the implementation of random assignment. Following a review of the methodological-theoretical literature on RCTs and alternative research designs, this article…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Research Methodology, Researchers, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cook, Thomas D.; Scriven, Michael; Coryn, Chris L. S.; Evergreen, Stephanie D. H. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
Legitimate knowledge claims about causation have been a central concern among evaluators and applied researchers for several decades and often have been the subject of heated debates. In recent years these debates have resurfaced with a renewed intensity, due in part to the priority currently being given to randomized experiments by many funders…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Research Design, Causal Models, Inferences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Labin, Susan N.; Duffy, Jennifer L.; Meyers, Duncan C.; Wandersman, Abraham; Lesesne, Catherine A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
The continuously growing demand for program results has produced an increased need for evaluation capacity building (ECB). The "Integrative ECB Model" was developed to integrate concepts from existing ECB theory literature and to structure a synthesis of the empirical ECB literature. The study used a broad-based research synthesis method with…
Descriptors: Synthesis, Literature Reviews, Data Analysis, Coding
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Azzam, Tarek – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
This study addresses the central question "How do evaluators' background characteristics relate to their evaluation design choices?" Evaluators were provided with a fictitious description of a school-based program and asked to design an evaluation of that program. Relevant background characteristics such as level of experience,…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Christie, Christina A.; Fleischer, Dreolin Nesbitt – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
To describe the recent practice of evaluation, specifically method and design choices, the authors performed a content analysis on 117 evaluation studies published in eight North American evaluation-focused journals for a 3-year period (2004-2006). The authors chose this time span because it follows the scientifically based research (SBR)…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Periodicals, Qualitative Research, Research Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Coryn, Chris L. S.; Noakes, Lindsay A.; Westine, Carl D.; Schroter, Daniela C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
Although the general conceptual basis appeared far earlier, theory-driven evaluation came to prominence only a few decades ago with the appearance of Chen's 1990 book "Theory-Driven Evaluations." Since that time, the approach has attracted many supporters as well as detractors. In this paper, 45 cases of theory-driven evaluations, published over a…
Descriptors: Evidence, Program Evaluation, Educational Practices, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
This essay explores the contributions of "Evaluation Practice" and the "American Journal of Evaluation" to our understanding of evaluation ethics. The review is organized according to the five Guiding Principles for Evaluators (Systematic Inquiry, Competence, Integrity/Honesty, Respect for People, and Responsibilities for General and Public…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Ethics, Inquiry, Systems Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Azzam, Tarek – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
A simulation study was conducted in an attempt to examine how evaluators modify their evaluation design in response to differing stakeholder groups. In this study, evaluators were provided with a fictitious description of a school-based program. They were then asked to design an evaluation of the program. After the evaluation design decisions were…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Simulation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Reichardt, Charles S. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
I define a treatment effect in terms of a comparison of outcomes and provide a typology of all possible comparisons that can be used to estimate treatment effects, including comparisons that are relatively unknown in both the literature and practice. I then assess the relative merit, worth, and value of all possible comparisons based on the…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tourmen, Claire – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
How do evaluation practitioners make choices when they evaluate a program? What function do evaluation theories play in practice? In this article, I report on an exploratory study that examined evaluation practices in France. The research began with observations of practitioners' activities, with a particular focus on the phases of evaluation…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Foreign Countries, Evaluation Methods, Theory Practice Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sridharan, Sanjeev – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
This article describes the design and evaluation approaches to address the complexity posed by systems change initiatives. The role of evaluations in addressing the following issues is briefly reviewed: moving from strategic planning to implementation, impacts on system-level coordination, anticipated timeline of impact, and individual level…
Descriptors: Strategic Planning, Case Studies, Reader Response, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lam, Tony C. M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
D'Eon et al. concluded that change in performance self-assessment means from before to after a workshop can detect workshop success in their and other situations. In this commentary, their recommendation is refuted by showing that (a) self-assessments with balanced over- and underestimations are still biased and should not be used to evaluate…
Descriptors: Workshops, Success, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Test Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Botcheva, Luba; Shih, Johanna; Huffman, Lynne C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
This paper describes a process-oriented approach to culturally competent evaluation, focusing on a case study of an evaluation of an HIV/AIDS educational program in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. We suggest that cultural competency in evaluation is not a function of a static set of prescribed steps but is achieved via ongoing reflection, correction, and…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cultural Context, Competence, Evaluation Research
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4