NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
American Journal of Evaluation764
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 316 to 330 of 764 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wandersman, Abraham; Alia, Kassandra; Cook, Brittany S.; Hsu, Lewis L.; Ramaswamy, Rohit – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
Many evaluations of programs tend to show few outcomes. One solution to this has been an increasing prominence of the movement that requires programs to implement evidence-based interventions (EBIs). But in a complex world with complex organizations and complex interventions, many challenges have arisen to the implementation of EBIs with fidelity…
Descriptors: Intervention, Evidence Based Practice, Accountability, Outcome Measures
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Owczarzak, Jill; Broaddus, Michelle; Pinkerton, Steven – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
Evaluation has become expected within the nonprofit sector, including HIV prevention service delivery through community-based organizations (CBOs). While staff and directors at CBOs may acknowledge the potential contribution of evaluation data to the improvement of agency services, the results of evaluation are often used to demonstrate fiscal…
Descriptors: Accountability, Evidence Based Practice, Community Organizations, Nonprofit Organizations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Garcia-Iriarte, Edurne; Suarez-Balcazar, Yolanda; Taylor-Ritzler, Tina; Luna, Maria – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
Evaluation capacity building (ECB) has become a popular approach for helping community-based organizations (CBOs) to meet their funders' demands for accountability. This case study reports the ECB process with one staff member using a catalyst-for-change approach. The authors analyzed the role of the catalyst in diffusing evaluation knowledge and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Community Organizations, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Preskill, Hallie – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
Though several excellent literature reviews and research syntheses have been conducted, and thoughtful frameworks and models have been proposed, I believe it is time for the evaluation field to tackle the "hard stuff" of evaluation capacity building (ECB). This entails engaging staff in ECB activities, building the evaluation capacity of…
Descriptors: Capacity Building, Evaluation, Theory Practice Relationship, Nonprofit Organizations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Eckerd, Adam; Moulton, Stephanie – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
Evaluating the performance of nonprofit organizations has been of growing importance for the last several decades. Although there is much good that can come out of self-improvement, there is substantial heterogeneity within the sector that calls into question the usefulness of "across the board" evaluation tools. In this article, the authors…
Descriptors: Nonprofit Organizations, Evaluation Methods, Evidence, Role
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Harvill, Eleanor L.; Peck, Laura R.; Bell, Stephen H. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
Using exogenous characteristics to identify endogenous subgroups, the approach discussed in this method note creates symmetric subsets within treatment and control groups, allowing the analysis to take advantage of an experimental design. In order to maintain treatment--control symmetry, however, prior work has posited that it is necessary to use…
Descriptors: Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Research Design, Sampling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Morgan, David L.; Eliot, Susan; Lowe, Robert A.; Gorman, Paul – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
Although evaluation researchers frequently make use of focus groups and individual interviews as sources of qualitative data, there has been far less attention to dyadic interviews that create a conversation between two research participants. This article describes dyadic interviews as a format that shares many of the advantages of focus groups,…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Interpersonal Communication, Focus Groups, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Olejniczak, Karol – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
Knowledge brokering is a promising practice for addressing the challenge of using research evidence, including evaluation findings, in policy implementation. For public policy practitioners, it means playing the role of an intermediary who steers the flow of knowledge between producers (researchers) and users (decision makers). It requires a set…
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Program Improvement, Program Implementation, Public Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Freeman, Melissa; Hall, Jori N. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
All social and professional practices are historically situated, evolving forms of acting and interacting. Evaluation, as a practice, is shaped by and shapes the practice evaluated. This article contributes to responsive and values-engaged evaluation approaches by reflecting on the space where these two practices intersect. The evaluative task was…
Descriptors: Professional Development Schools, Professional Development, Participant Observation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Whitehall, Anna K.; Hill, Laura G.; Koehler, Christian R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
The move to build capacity for internal evaluation is a common organizational theme in social service delivery, and in many settings, the evaluator is also the practitioner who delivers the service. The goal of the present study was to extend our limited knowledge of practitioner evaluation. Specifically, the authors examined practitioner concerns…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Adult Educators, Beliefs, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Durand, Roger; Decker, Phillip J.; Kirkman, Dorothy M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
Despite our best efforts as evaluators, program implementation failures abound. A wide variety of valuable methodologies have been adopted to explain and evaluate the "why" of these failures. Yet, typically these methodologies have been employed concurrently (e.g., project monitoring) or to the post-hoc assessment of program activities.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Implementation, Failure, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Maemura, Yu – American Journal of Evaluation, 2016
This article presents a discourse analytic study of how the concept of impartiality is socially constructed by members of the development aid community through an examination of linguistic traits and patterns within (a) inter- and intraorganizational interactions and (b) relevant aid evaluation policy documents. A qualitative analysis of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Discourse Analysis, Economic Development, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Molas-Gallart, Jordi – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
Through a comparative study of the United Kingdom and Spain, this article addresses the effect of different research governance structures on the functioning and uses of research evaluation. It distinguishes three main evaluation uses: distributive, improvement, and controlling. Research evaluation in the United Kingdom plays important…
Descriptors: Governance, Foreign Countries, Comparative Analysis, Research Administration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Anderson, Clara; Chase, Malinda; Johnson, James; Mekiana, Debbie; McIntyre, Drena; Ruerup, Amelia; Kerr, Sandy – American Journal of Evaluation, 2012
Despite 11,000 years of honing evaluation skills in order to thrive in some of the harshest climatic conditions on the planet, there are few Alaska Native program evaluators and until a recent exchange with New Zealand "Maori", there was no collective vision for building Alaska Native capacity in program evaluation. This article tells…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Alaska Natives, Foreign Countries, Ethnic Groups
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chouinard, Jill Anne; Boyce, Ayesha S.; Hicks, Juanita; Jones, Jennie; Long, Justin; Pitts, Robyn; Stockdale, Myrah – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
To explore the relationship between theory and practice in evaluation, we focus on the perspectives and experiences of student evaluators, as they move from the classroom to an engagement with the social, political, and cultural dynamics of evaluation in the field. Through reflective journals, postcourse interviews, and facilitated group…
Descriptors: Theory Practice Relationship, Novices, Evaluation, Evaluators
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  18  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  24  |  25  |  26  |  ...  |  51