Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 29 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 111 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 253 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 562 |
Descriptor
Source
American Journal of Evaluation | 764 |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 8 |
Media Staff | 1 |
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Canada | 18 |
United States | 11 |
California | 10 |
Netherlands | 10 |
New Zealand | 8 |
United Kingdom | 7 |
Africa | 6 |
Asia | 6 |
Australia | 5 |
Denmark | 5 |
Germany | 5 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Older Americans Act 1965 | 1 |
Personal Responsibility and… | 1 |
Workforce Investment Act 1998 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Bayley Scales of Infant… | 1 |
Facts on Aging Quiz | 1 |
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Julnes, George; Newcomer, Kathryn – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
The growing emphasis on using evidence to inform decisions in public sector policy making has created both opportunities for and demands on the American Evaluation Association (AEA) in pursuing its mission "to improve evaluation practices and methods, increase evaluation use, promote evaluation as a profession, and support the contribution of…
Descriptors: Professional Associations, Evaluation, Professionalism, Evidence Based Practice
Sturges, Keith M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
Drawing on a qualitative study of an educational reform and its external evaluation, I describe how a well-intentioned but poorly conceptualized evaluation helped perpetuate asymmetries in the generation and use of evaluation findings. This article explores this project's failure to clarify evaluator roles, identify intended users and expected…
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Stakeholders, Role, Evaluators
Boyce, Ayesha S.; McGowan, Brian L. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
As the field of evaluation continues to expand, so do evaluation course offerings. However, little is known about the backgrounds of evaluation educators, how they go about planning their courses, challenges experienced, or how they attain competency as teachers. This study offers an initial understanding of novice evaluation educators' experience…
Descriptors: Beginning Teachers, Evaluation, Teaching Experience, Curriculum Development
Lamont, Andrea E.; Markle, Robert S.; Wright, Annie; Abraczinskas, Michelle; Siddall, James; Wandersman, Abraham; Imm, Pam; Cook, Brittany – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Traditional methods of evaluation are limited in their ability to answer key questions often of interest to process evaluators, such as heterogeneity in the ways individuals adopt new programs. In this article, we demonstrate how a statistical approach, Latent Class Analysis, can help improve the quality of process evaluations and illustrate its…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Item Response Theory, Teaching Skills, Educational Technology
Westlund, Erik; Stuart, Elizabeth A. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
This article discusses the nonuse, misuse, and proper use of pilot studies in experimental evaluation research. The authors first show that there is little theoretical, practical, or empirical guidance available to researchers who seek to incorporate pilot studies into experimental evaluation research designs. The authors then discuss how pilot…
Descriptors: Use Studies, Pilot Projects, Evaluation Research, Experiments
Neal, Jennifer Watling; Neal, Zachary P.; VanDyke, Erika; Kornbluh, Mariah – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
Qualitative data offer advantages to evaluators, including rich information about stakeholders' perspectives and experiences. However, qualitative data analysis is labor-intensive and slow, conflicting with evaluators' needs to provide punctual feedback to their clients. In this method note, we contribute to the literature on rapid evaluation and…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Data Analysis, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Patton, Michael Quinn – American Journal of Evaluation, 2015
Our understanding of programs is enhanced when trained, skilled, and observant evaluators go "into the field"--the real world where programs are conducted--paying attention to what's going on, systematically documenting what they see, and reporting what they learn. The article opens by presenting and illustrating twelve reasons for…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Design Requirements, Field Studies
Sink, Christopher A.; Lemich, Gregory – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Within the context of intentional collaboration between doctoral-level program evaluation and counselor educators, this article addresses the need for advanced training in program evaluation for preservice doctoral-level counselor education (CE) students. To determine the current level of evaluation training provided to doctoral students attending…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Graduate Students, Counselor Training, Audits (Verification)
Litwok, Daniel; Peck, Laura R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
In experimental evaluations of policy interventions, the so-called Bloom adjustment is commonly used to estimate the impact of the treatment on the treated. It does so by rescaling the estimated impact of the intention to treat--that is, the overall treatment-control group difference in outcomes for the entire experimental sample--by the…
Descriptors: Computation, Outcomes of Treatment, Program Evaluation, Scaling
Szijarto, Barbara; Cousins, J. Bradley – American Journal of Evaluation, 2019
This article reports findings from a research program exploring the role of mediation in an "adaptive learning" process through study of developmental evaluation (DE). Our study focuses on how mediators might influence the relationships between components of a social learning system and the implications for adaptive learning.…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Learning Processes, Socialization, Evaluation Methods
Pleger, Lyn; Sager, Fritz; Morris, Michael; Meyer, Wolfgang; Stockmann, Reinhard – American Journal of Evaluation, 2017
Pressure on evaluators has been investigated recently by surveys in the USA, the UK, Germany, and Switzerland. This study compares the results of those studies regarding pressure on evaluators in different countries. The findings suggest that independence of evaluations does not exist for many respondents. Moreover, the person who commissioned the…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Evaluators, Comparative Analysis, Surveys
Hall, Melvin E. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Despite political and rhetorical pronouncements of a reduction in racism, growing inequity in U.S. society continues to feature race as a prominent fault line with no evidence of reduction on the horizon. Of significant concern is the degree to which inequity among racially identified subgroups of the population link to policies and practices of…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Racial Bias, Race, African Americans
Patton, Michael Quinn – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Culturally and politically science is under attack. The core consequence of perceiving and asserting evaluation as science is that it enhances our credibility and effectiveness in supporting the importance of science in our world and brings us together with other scientists to make common cause in supporting and advocating for science. Other…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Sciences, Advocacy, Social Sciences
Putting the "Impact" in Impact Investing: The Rising Demand for Data and Evidence of Social Outcomes
Reisman, Jane; Olazabal, Veronica; Hoffman, Shawna – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Traditional social sector and international development organizations have prioritized measuring the impacts of their work for decades. Understanding the ways in which they are bringing about change or helping people and communities has long been part of the traditional social sector ethos. The Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) was founded by…
Descriptors: Social Problems, Investment, Measurement Techniques, Evaluation Methods
Duggan, Colleen; Bush, Kenneth – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
What is different about the conduct of evaluations in conflict zones compared to nonconflict zones--and how do these differences affect (if at all) the ethical calculations and behavior of evaluators? When are ethical issues too risky, or too uncertain, for evaluators to accept--or to continue--an evaluation? These are the core questions guiding…
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluators, Conflict, Evaluation